Background <p>Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is increasingly studied for regenerative therapies, yet the impact of different collection techniques on cell yield and quality remains unclear. This study compared standard needle-and-bag UCB collection with manual cord milking, performed both in utero (placenta attached) and ex utero (placenta delivered), using samples from healthy term infants ( &gt; 37 weeks gestation).</p> Method <p>Forty-two samples (<i>n</i> = 10 standard in utero, <i>n</i> = 10 standard ex utero, <i>n</i> = 10 milking in utero, <i>n</i> = 12 milking ex utero) were analyzed for blood volume, mononuclear cell count, and cellular composition via flow cytometry. Key cell populations included hematopoietic stem cells (CD34 + CD45 + ), endothelial progenitor cells (CD45 + CD34 + CD31 − CD133 + ), and mature endothelial cells (CD34 − CD45 − CD31 + ). Plasma cytokines, including inflammatory and angiogenic markers, were also assessed.</p> Results <p>No significant differences were found in total blood volume or mononuclear cell counts across groups. However, endothelial progenitor cell viability was significantly reduced in cord milking ex utero compared to standard in utero collection (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Cytokine analysis showed elevated IL-1RA and reduced VEGF-A in cord milking ex utero samples (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001 and <i>p</i> = 0.0004, respectively).</p> Conclusion <p>These findings suggest that in utero cord milking may be a viable alternative to standard UCB collection, preserving cell viability and cytokine integrity.</p> Impact <p><UnorderedList Mark="Bullet"> <ItemContent> <p>The standard method for collecting umbilical cord blood (UCB) has limitations, especially in cases like premature birth, where low volumes yield insufficient mononuclear and hematopoietic stem cells for therapeutic use.</p> </ItemContent> <ItemContent> <p>This study evaluated an alternative technique—umbilical cord milking—against the standard approach.</p> </ItemContent> <ItemContent> <p>As the first study to assess its efficacy for UCB collection, the findings offer insights into a viable alternative method.</p> </ItemContent> </UnorderedList></p> <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Umbilical cord milking as a technique to harvest cord blood derived cells for regenerative applications

  • Ricki Anne S. Marzan,
  • Kristyn Connelly,
  • Abdul Razak,
  • Lindsay Zhou,
  • Tayla R. Penny,
  • Courtney A. McDonald,
  • Atul Malhotra

摘要

Background

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is increasingly studied for regenerative therapies, yet the impact of different collection techniques on cell yield and quality remains unclear. This study compared standard needle-and-bag UCB collection with manual cord milking, performed both in utero (placenta attached) and ex utero (placenta delivered), using samples from healthy term infants ( > 37 weeks gestation).

Method

Forty-two samples (n = 10 standard in utero, n = 10 standard ex utero, n = 10 milking in utero, n = 12 milking ex utero) were analyzed for blood volume, mononuclear cell count, and cellular composition via flow cytometry. Key cell populations included hematopoietic stem cells (CD34 + CD45 + ), endothelial progenitor cells (CD45 + CD34 + CD31 − CD133 + ), and mature endothelial cells (CD34 − CD45 − CD31 + ). Plasma cytokines, including inflammatory and angiogenic markers, were also assessed.

Results

No significant differences were found in total blood volume or mononuclear cell counts across groups. However, endothelial progenitor cell viability was significantly reduced in cord milking ex utero compared to standard in utero collection (p < 0.0001). Cytokine analysis showed elevated IL-1RA and reduced VEGF-A in cord milking ex utero samples (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0004, respectively).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that in utero cord milking may be a viable alternative to standard UCB collection, preserving cell viability and cytokine integrity.

Impact

The standard method for collecting umbilical cord blood (UCB) has limitations, especially in cases like premature birth, where low volumes yield insufficient mononuclear and hematopoietic stem cells for therapeutic use.

This study evaluated an alternative technique—umbilical cord milking—against the standard approach.

As the first study to assess its efficacy for UCB collection, the findings offer insights into a viable alternative method.