Scholarlink

Impact <p><UnorderedList Mark="Bullet"> <ItemContent> <p>Body composition estimates in infancy differ substantially depending on the tool used (ADP, DXA, or BIA) and on within-tool factors (e.g. DXA software version).</p> </ItemContent> <ItemContent> <p>This study systematically compares three widely used infant body composition tools, demonstrating that the choice of tool and analysis approach can markedly affect the results.</p> </ItemContent> <ItemContent> <p>These findings underscore the need for caution when comparing infant body composition measurements across studies or over time where a change in tool type has been required.</p> </ItemContent> <ItemContent> <p>Standardized protocols and transparent reporting will be crucial for improving paediatric nutrition and growth assessments.</p> </ItemContent> </UnorderedList></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparison of air displacement plethysmography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and bioimpedance in 6-week-old and 6-month-old infants

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月15日

查看全文
  • Jaz Lyons-Reid,
  • José G. B. Derraik,
  • Leigh C. Ward,
  • Mya-Thway Tint,
  • Benjamin B. Albert,
  • Cathriona R. Monnard,
  • J. Manuel Ramos Nieves,
  • Timothy Kenealy,
  • Keith M. Godfrey,
  • Shiao-Yng Chan,
  • Wayne S. Cutfield

摘要

Impact

Body composition estimates in infancy differ substantially depending on the tool used (ADP, DXA, or BIA) and on within-tool factors (e.g. DXA software version).

This study systematically compares three widely used infant body composition tools, demonstrating that the choice of tool and analysis approach can markedly affect the results.

These findings underscore the need for caution when comparing infant body composition measurements across studies or over time where a change in tool type has been required.

Standardized protocols and transparent reporting will be crucial for improving paediatric nutrition and growth assessments.