Scholarlink

Objective <p>Evaluate Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) interpreter access and utilization, unit-based interpreter policies and initiatives, staff awareness and confidence in understanding language-access laws, and perceptions of language-based inequities.</p> Study design <p>An exploratory national survey of NICU staff was distributed via the National Association of Neonatal Nurses and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) (10/2024-4/2025). Descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis were used for survey results.</p> Result <p>The 189 respondents represented all ten AAP districts. Most were aware of NICU-based interpreter policies (76%). 81% were not aware of additional state laws/provisions and many lacked confidence understanding federal (43%) or state (63%) language-access laws. Many respondents disagreed that language-discordance resulted in worse quality of care (40%) and outcomes (59%) in their NICU.</p> Conclusion <p>Results highlight the need for additional education on federal and state laws and provisions as well as the broad and systemic nature of language-based healthcare inequities across institutions.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Language access in the neonatal intensive care unit: inequities, legality, practice, and call to action

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月26日

查看全文
  • Julianna Mazziotti,
  • Cristian J. Tolento,
  • Devlynne S. Ondusko

摘要

Objective

Evaluate Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) interpreter access and utilization, unit-based interpreter policies and initiatives, staff awareness and confidence in understanding language-access laws, and perceptions of language-based inequities.

Study design

An exploratory national survey of NICU staff was distributed via the National Association of Neonatal Nurses and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) (10/2024-4/2025). Descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis were used for survey results.

Result

The 189 respondents represented all ten AAP districts. Most were aware of NICU-based interpreter policies (76%). 81% were not aware of additional state laws/provisions and many lacked confidence understanding federal (43%) or state (63%) language-access laws. Many respondents disagreed that language-discordance resulted in worse quality of care (40%) and outcomes (59%) in their NICU.

Conclusion

Results highlight the need for additional education on federal and state laws and provisions as well as the broad and systemic nature of language-based healthcare inequities across institutions.