Scholarlink

Introduction <p>This study aimed to compare Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), Indonesian Maternal and Children Health Handbook (MCH-HB), and Indonesian Prenatal Institute (IPI) models for predicting PE.</p> Materials/subjects and methods <p>Maternal risk factors, biophysical, and biochemical markers were recorded from women screened for PE at 11–14 gestational weeks. The receiving operator curve (ROC) analysis was used to compare the detection rate (DR) among prediction models.</p> Results <p>For all PE at a 10% false-positive rate (FPR), FMF had a DR 62.9%; MCH-HB had a DR 50.0%; IPI had a DR 66.9%. For early-onset PE, at 10% FPR FMF had a DR 80.3%; MCH-HB had a DR 71.4%; IPI had a DR 81.5%. For preterm PE at 10% FPR, FMF had a DR 70.2%; MCH-HB had a DR 38.5%; IPI had a DR 66.9%.</p> Discussion <p>IPI algorithm is comparable to FMF and outperforms MCH-HB algorithm for all, early-onset, and preterm PE screening.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparison of first trimester preeclampsia combined screening performances with various approaches in the Indonesian population

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月21日

查看全文
  • Adly Nanda Al Fattah,
  • Muhammad Pradhiki Mahindra,
  • Mirani Ulfa Yusrika,
  • Muhammad Pradhika Mapindra,
  • Felix Firyanto Widjaja,
  • Vania Permata Putri,
  • Shinda Marizni,
  • Sara L. Hillman,
  • Raden Aditya Kusuma

摘要

Introduction

This study aimed to compare Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), Indonesian Maternal and Children Health Handbook (MCH-HB), and Indonesian Prenatal Institute (IPI) models for predicting PE.

Materials/subjects and methods

Maternal risk factors, biophysical, and biochemical markers were recorded from women screened for PE at 11–14 gestational weeks. The receiving operator curve (ROC) analysis was used to compare the detection rate (DR) among prediction models.

Results

For all PE at a 10% false-positive rate (FPR), FMF had a DR 62.9%; MCH-HB had a DR 50.0%; IPI had a DR 66.9%. For early-onset PE, at 10% FPR FMF had a DR 80.3%; MCH-HB had a DR 71.4%; IPI had a DR 81.5%. For preterm PE at 10% FPR, FMF had a DR 70.2%; MCH-HB had a DR 38.5%; IPI had a DR 66.9%.

Discussion

IPI algorithm is comparable to FMF and outperforms MCH-HB algorithm for all, early-onset, and preterm PE screening.