Comparison of efficacy between beractant and poractant alfa in respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants (28–33+6 weeks gestational age) using the less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) technique: A randomized controlled trial
摘要
Exogenous surfactant therapy is vital in managing respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants, with less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) gaining popularity. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and short-term outcomes of LISA using beractant and poractant alfa.
Study designIn a randomized controlled trial, we enrolled preterm infants (28–33+6 weeks) with RDS requiring surfactant. LISA was employed, with beractant at 100 mg/kg or poractant-alfa at 200 mg/kg. Primary outcome was the need for intubation within 72 hours.
ResultsAmong 120 infants, 3.3% in both groups required intubation within 72 hours (p value 1.00, 95% CI 0.14–6.86). No significant differences in secondary outcomes were noted. However, beractant was significantly more economical than poractant-alfa, with a significantly lower surfactant cost and total care cost for infant hospital stays.
ConclusionBeractant and poractant-alfa exhibit similar efficacy in LISA for preterm infants with RDS. Economic considerations, especially in LMICs, favour beractant.
Clinical trial registation(CTRI/2023/03/050375).