Background <p>Lithium production and processing is rapidly expanding, potentially increasing its environmental release. However, population-level exposure is poorly characterized in most countries.</p> Objective <p>Our objective was to evaluate drinking water and urinary lithium levels in the Strong Heart Family Study, a longitudinal study conducted with tribal partners in Arizona, Oklahoma, and North Dakota and South Dakota.</p> Methods <p>Lithium was measured in household tap water samples collected in 2022–2024 (<i>n</i> = 673) and spot urine samples collected in 2006–2009 and 2022–2024 (<i>n</i> = 613 paired samples). We examined within-person changes in urinary lithium, correlations between water and urinary lithium, and used mixed-effects models to estimate geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of urinary lithium in relation to study phase, water lithium, water source, and participant characteristics.</p> Results <p>Median (interquartile range) water lithium was 35.6 (9.0, 54.1) µg/L. Water lithium exceeded the United States Geological Survey health-based screening level (10 µg/L) in 100% of Arizona, 93% of North Dakota/South Dakota, and 35% of Oklahoma samples. Median urinary lithium was 30.8 (17.4, 53.3) µg/g creatinine in 2006–2009 and 31.2 (18.0, 56.0) in 2022-2024. The GMR comparing urinary lithium in 2022-2024 to 2006-2009 was 1.08 (1.02–1.14). Water lithium correlated with urinary lithium in 2006-2009 (ρ = 0.61) and 2022-2024 (ρ = 0.59). Each doubling of water lithium was associated with 22% higher urinary lithium before and 9% higher after adjustment for study site; all models adjusted for participant characteristics and water source. Water lithium explained 29% of variation in urinary lithium levels.</p> Significance <p>Lithium in drinking water is a widespread and persistent source of human exposure across Tribal communities in the Western United States, with regional variation. Our findings also support the use of urinary lithium as a biomarker of environmental exposure.</p> Impact <p>Our study provides novel evidence of high levels of lithium in household drinking water (2022–2024) in Native American communities. We found that drinking water lithium in Arizona, North Dakota and South Dakota often exceeded the United States Geological Survey health-based screening level, urinary lithium levels remained stable over 15-years of follow-up, and household drinking water lithium explained a substantial proportion of variability in urinary lithium. Our findings improve lithium exposure estimations among Strong Heart Family Study communities and support the need for further environmental monitoring and risk evaluation, particularly as lithium extraction and processing accelerate to meet energy demands.</p> <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Lithium exposure in areas of the Western United States: Water and urinary levels in the Strong Heart Family Study

  • Ellen B. Bannon,
  • Wil Lieberman-Cribbin,
  • Anirban Basu,
  • Arijeet Mitra,
  • Chiugo Izuchukwu,
  • James Ross,
  • Shams Azad,
  • Whitney Collado,
  • Allison Kupsco,
  • Arce Domingo Relloso,
  • Jeff Goldsmith,
  • Jason G. Umans,
  • Ying Zhang,
  • Tauqeer Ali,
  • Amanda M. Fretts,
  • Tracy Zacher,
  • Rae O’Leary,
  • Marcia O’Leary,
  • Benjamin C. Bostick,
  • Steven N. Chillrud,
  • Ana Navas-Acien,
  • Anne E. Nigra,
  • Kathrin Schilling

摘要

Background

Lithium production and processing is rapidly expanding, potentially increasing its environmental release. However, population-level exposure is poorly characterized in most countries.

Objective

Our objective was to evaluate drinking water and urinary lithium levels in the Strong Heart Family Study, a longitudinal study conducted with tribal partners in Arizona, Oklahoma, and North Dakota and South Dakota.

Methods

Lithium was measured in household tap water samples collected in 2022–2024 (n = 673) and spot urine samples collected in 2006–2009 and 2022–2024 (n = 613 paired samples). We examined within-person changes in urinary lithium, correlations between water and urinary lithium, and used mixed-effects models to estimate geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of urinary lithium in relation to study phase, water lithium, water source, and participant characteristics.

Results

Median (interquartile range) water lithium was 35.6 (9.0, 54.1) µg/L. Water lithium exceeded the United States Geological Survey health-based screening level (10 µg/L) in 100% of Arizona, 93% of North Dakota/South Dakota, and 35% of Oklahoma samples. Median urinary lithium was 30.8 (17.4, 53.3) µg/g creatinine in 2006–2009 and 31.2 (18.0, 56.0) in 2022-2024. The GMR comparing urinary lithium in 2022-2024 to 2006-2009 was 1.08 (1.02–1.14). Water lithium correlated with urinary lithium in 2006-2009 (ρ = 0.61) and 2022-2024 (ρ = 0.59). Each doubling of water lithium was associated with 22% higher urinary lithium before and 9% higher after adjustment for study site; all models adjusted for participant characteristics and water source. Water lithium explained 29% of variation in urinary lithium levels.

Significance

Lithium in drinking water is a widespread and persistent source of human exposure across Tribal communities in the Western United States, with regional variation. Our findings also support the use of urinary lithium as a biomarker of environmental exposure.

Impact

Our study provides novel evidence of high levels of lithium in household drinking water (2022–2024) in Native American communities. We found that drinking water lithium in Arizona, North Dakota and South Dakota often exceeded the United States Geological Survey health-based screening level, urinary lithium levels remained stable over 15-years of follow-up, and household drinking water lithium explained a substantial proportion of variability in urinary lithium. Our findings improve lithium exposure estimations among Strong Heart Family Study communities and support the need for further environmental monitoring and risk evaluation, particularly as lithium extraction and processing accelerate to meet energy demands.