Scholarlink

<p>Dilapidated ancient brick pagodas face collapse risks under extreme weather. Using Shanxi’s Ganying Pagoda (second-floor damage and separated bodies) as a case, this study evaluates three reinforcement strategies: steel frame core tube (Case 1), base isolation (Case 2), and their combination (Case 3). Nonlinear dynamic analyses under far-field/near-field seismic waves reveal: Case 1 shortens natural periods, amplifies base shear, and worsens damage under near-field pulses. Case 2 extends periods and controls responses but causes second-floor connection damage due to load transfer between separated bodies. Case 3 integrates isolation and steel frame constraints, maintaining elastic behavior and minimizing damage. Pushover results show Case 1 enhances ultimate capacity, while Cases 2/3 ensure isolator failure precedes structural damage, with Case 3 controlling interstory drifts most effectively. The combined strategy optimally balances structural integrity and heritage preservation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Research on protection of a nearly thousand-year-old dilapidated ancient brick pagoda in China

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月10日

查看全文
  • Kangjie Ling,
  • Danna Ma,
  • Yaling Chen,
  • Hui Li,
  • Dewen Liu,
  • Jianhua Li,
  • Yu Lin

摘要

Dilapidated ancient brick pagodas face collapse risks under extreme weather. Using Shanxi’s Ganying Pagoda (second-floor damage and separated bodies) as a case, this study evaluates three reinforcement strategies: steel frame core tube (Case 1), base isolation (Case 2), and their combination (Case 3). Nonlinear dynamic analyses under far-field/near-field seismic waves reveal: Case 1 shortens natural periods, amplifies base shear, and worsens damage under near-field pulses. Case 2 extends periods and controls responses but causes second-floor connection damage due to load transfer between separated bodies. Case 3 integrates isolation and steel frame constraints, maintaining elastic behavior and minimizing damage. Pushover results show Case 1 enhances ultimate capacity, while Cases 2/3 ensure isolator failure precedes structural damage, with Case 3 controlling interstory drifts most effectively. The combined strategy optimally balances structural integrity and heritage preservation.