Scholarlink

<p>Background: Patient education materials (PEMs) are essential for enhancing health literacy and supporting informed decision-making. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) is a widely recognized instrument for evaluating the understandability and actionability of PEMs. However, the absence of an Arabic version of PEMAT has restricted its applicability among Arabic-speaking populations. This study aims to translate and validate the Arabic versions of PEMAT-P (for print materials) and PEMAT-AV (for audiovisual materials). Methods: A systematic translation and cultural adaptation process was conducted following established guidelines. This included forward translation, back-translation, expert review, and cognitive debriefing. A total of 42 participants were recruited to evaluate the reliability of the Arabic PEMAT versions. Test–retest reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach’s Alpha. Pearson correlation and the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) were also calculated. Results: The Arabic PEMAT-P demonstrated moderate reliability in the understandability domain (ICC = 0.69, Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.82) and strong reliability in the actionability domain (ICC = 0.74, Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.85). The Arabic PEMAT-AV showed substantial reliability in the understandability domain (ICC = 0.77, Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.87), but moderate reliability in the actionability domain (ICC = 0.64, Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.78). Minimal discrepancies were observed between the original and back-translated versions, supporting the tool's linguistic and conceptual equivalence. Conclusion: The Arabic-translated PEMAT-P and PEMAT-AV are reliable tools for evaluating patient education materials. Their implementation can enhance health literacy and patient engagement in Arabic-speaking populations. Future research should focus on improving the actionability of audiovisual materials.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Arabic version of the patient education materials assessment tool (PEMAT): translation and validation

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月5日

查看全文
  • Marwan A. Alrasheed,
  • Aliyah Almobarak,
  • Hisham M. Alfayyadh,
  • Abdulelah Alkahtani,
  • Bander Balkhi

摘要

Background: Patient education materials (PEMs) are essential for enhancing health literacy and supporting informed decision-making. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) is a widely recognized instrument for evaluating the understandability and actionability of PEMs. However, the absence of an Arabic version of PEMAT has restricted its applicability among Arabic-speaking populations. This study aims to translate and validate the Arabic versions of PEMAT-P (for print materials) and PEMAT-AV (for audiovisual materials). Methods: A systematic translation and cultural adaptation process was conducted following established guidelines. This included forward translation, back-translation, expert review, and cognitive debriefing. A total of 42 participants were recruited to evaluate the reliability of the Arabic PEMAT versions. Test–retest reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach’s Alpha. Pearson correlation and the Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) were also calculated. Results: The Arabic PEMAT-P demonstrated moderate reliability in the understandability domain (ICC = 0.69, Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.82) and strong reliability in the actionability domain (ICC = 0.74, Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.85). The Arabic PEMAT-AV showed substantial reliability in the understandability domain (ICC = 0.77, Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.87), but moderate reliability in the actionability domain (ICC = 0.64, Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.78). Minimal discrepancies were observed between the original and back-translated versions, supporting the tool's linguistic and conceptual equivalence. Conclusion: The Arabic-translated PEMAT-P and PEMAT-AV are reliable tools for evaluating patient education materials. Their implementation can enhance health literacy and patient engagement in Arabic-speaking populations. Future research should focus on improving the actionability of audiovisual materials.