Purpose <p>Examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and astigmatism directionality using vector analysis of refractive and corneal components (<i>J</i><sub>0</sub>, <i>J</i><sub>45</sub>) in a nationally representative sample of schoolchildren. Refractive and corneal <i>J</i><sub>0</sub> was the primary outcome, with secondary aims to assess whether BMI influences astigmatism severity or other refractive and axial parameters.</p> Methods <p>This cross-sectional study recruited 1626 schoolchildren aged 6–7 (<i>n</i> = 728) and 12–13 years (<i>n</i> = 898) from 37 randomly selected schools in Ireland. Cycloplegic autorefraction and ocular biometry were obtained. Height and weight were measured and BMI calculated and analysed as a continuous predictor, with WHO-defined BMI categories used for secondary severity modelling. Refractive and corneal astigmatism were decomposed into vector components (<i>J</i><sub>0</sub>, <i>J</i><sub>45</sub>). Multivariate linear regression assessed associations between BMI and <i>J</i><sub>0</sub>, <i>J</i><sub>45</sub>, spherical equivalent refraction (SER), axial length (AL) and axial length/corneal radius (AL/CR) ratio, adjusted for sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and urban/rural location. Ordinal logistic regression examined associations between BMI category and clinically defined astigmatism severity.</p> Results <p>Higher BMI was associated with a positive shift in refractive <i>J</i><sub>0</sub>, indicating increased with-the-rule astigmatism. Associations were small but consistent in both age groups: 12–13 years (corneal <i>J</i>₀ <i>β</i> = 0.03, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; refractive <i>J</i>₀ <i>β</i> = 0.02, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and 6–7 years (corneal <i>J</i>₀ <i>β</i> = 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.008; refractive <i>J</i>₀ <i>β</i> = 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.007). Associations with <i>J</i><sub>45</sub> were weak and inconsistent. BMI was not associated with SER, AL or the AL/CR ratio. Compared with non-overweight peers, children with obesity had higher odds of moderate-to-severe astigmatism (6–7 years: OR = 5.26, 95% CI: 1.70–9.37; 12–13 years: OR = 2.50, 95% CI: 1.00–4.34).</p> Conclusions <p>Higher BMI was independently associated with increased <i>J</i><sub>0</sub>, indicating greater with-the-rule refractive and corneal astigmatism, without evidence of an effect on axial length or overall refractive status. These cross-sectional findings suggest a potential biomechanical influence on corneal toricity, highlighting the need for longitudinal studies to clarify causality and mechanisms.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Body Mass Index is Associated With Direction-Specific Increases in With-the-Rule Corneal and Refractive Astigmatism in Schoolchildren

  • Eoin Kerin,
  • Michael Moore,
  • James Loughman,
  • Síofra Harrington

摘要

Purpose

Examine the association between body mass index (BMI) and astigmatism directionality using vector analysis of refractive and corneal components (J0, J45) in a nationally representative sample of schoolchildren. Refractive and corneal J0 was the primary outcome, with secondary aims to assess whether BMI influences astigmatism severity or other refractive and axial parameters.

Methods

This cross-sectional study recruited 1626 schoolchildren aged 6–7 (n = 728) and 12–13 years (n = 898) from 37 randomly selected schools in Ireland. Cycloplegic autorefraction and ocular biometry were obtained. Height and weight were measured and BMI calculated and analysed as a continuous predictor, with WHO-defined BMI categories used for secondary severity modelling. Refractive and corneal astigmatism were decomposed into vector components (J0, J45). Multivariate linear regression assessed associations between BMI and J0, J45, spherical equivalent refraction (SER), axial length (AL) and axial length/corneal radius (AL/CR) ratio, adjusted for sex, ethnicity, socioeconomic status and urban/rural location. Ordinal logistic regression examined associations between BMI category and clinically defined astigmatism severity.

Results

Higher BMI was associated with a positive shift in refractive J0, indicating increased with-the-rule astigmatism. Associations were small but consistent in both age groups: 12–13 years (corneal Jβ = 0.03, p < 0.001; refractive Jβ = 0.02, p < 0.001) and 6–7 years (corneal Jβ = 0.03, p = 0.008; refractive Jβ = 0.03, p = 0.007). Associations with J45 were weak and inconsistent. BMI was not associated with SER, AL or the AL/CR ratio. Compared with non-overweight peers, children with obesity had higher odds of moderate-to-severe astigmatism (6–7 years: OR = 5.26, 95% CI: 1.70–9.37; 12–13 years: OR = 2.50, 95% CI: 1.00–4.34).

Conclusions

Higher BMI was independently associated with increased J0, indicating greater with-the-rule refractive and corneal astigmatism, without evidence of an effect on axial length or overall refractive status. These cross-sectional findings suggest a potential biomechanical influence on corneal toricity, highlighting the need for longitudinal studies to clarify causality and mechanisms.