Scholarlink

<p>Accelerating the development of more heterogeneous forest structures is an important goal of many contemporary forest management regimes. However, long-term silvicultural experiments that compare different approaches to generating structural complexity are rare. We took advantage of a replicated silvicultural experiment that was established in mountain ash (<i>Eucalyptus regnans</i>) forests in southeastern Australia in the late 1980s. We evaluated multi-decadal forest development responses to seven different silvicultural treatments: clearfelling (clearcutting), seed tree, three gap sizes (0.25, 0.5, and 2 ha), and two levels of overstorey retention (30% and 50%), plus unharvested controls. We compared a range of stand structural and compositional attributes, non-timber values (e.g., sequestered carbon, total sapwood area [a proxy for stand water-use]), and habitat features in 53 study plots replicated across all of the silvicultural treatments. Thirty years after the experiment was initiated, three treatment groups were apparent: 1) the gap (0.25-2 ha) treatments were dominated by small-diameter mountain ash, a greater abundance of <i>Acacia</i>, and relatively low basal area; 2) the clearfell and seed tree treatments had moderate basal area of mountain ash and the most uniform size-class distributions; and 3) the overstorey retention treatments had the largest trees across all treatments, as well as the greatest basal area and size inequality. Our findings indicate that alternative silvicultural systems could be used to accelerate the development of large trees and complex forest structures and support a broader range of forest values than the standard clearfell, burn, and sow silviculture prescriptions historically applied in mountain ash forests.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Alternative Silvicultural Systems Maintain Multiple Values in Tall Eucalypt Forest

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月1日

查看全文
  • Kaitlyn L. Hammond,
  • Craig R. Nitschke,
  • Raphaël Trouvé,
  • Patrick J. Baker

摘要

Accelerating the development of more heterogeneous forest structures is an important goal of many contemporary forest management regimes. However, long-term silvicultural experiments that compare different approaches to generating structural complexity are rare. We took advantage of a replicated silvicultural experiment that was established in mountain ash (Eucalyptus regnans) forests in southeastern Australia in the late 1980s. We evaluated multi-decadal forest development responses to seven different silvicultural treatments: clearfelling (clearcutting), seed tree, three gap sizes (0.25, 0.5, and 2 ha), and two levels of overstorey retention (30% and 50%), plus unharvested controls. We compared a range of stand structural and compositional attributes, non-timber values (e.g., sequestered carbon, total sapwood area [a proxy for stand water-use]), and habitat features in 53 study plots replicated across all of the silvicultural treatments. Thirty years after the experiment was initiated, three treatment groups were apparent: 1) the gap (0.25-2 ha) treatments were dominated by small-diameter mountain ash, a greater abundance of Acacia, and relatively low basal area; 2) the clearfell and seed tree treatments had moderate basal area of mountain ash and the most uniform size-class distributions; and 3) the overstorey retention treatments had the largest trees across all treatments, as well as the greatest basal area and size inequality. Our findings indicate that alternative silvicultural systems could be used to accelerate the development of large trees and complex forest structures and support a broader range of forest values than the standard clearfell, burn, and sow silviculture prescriptions historically applied in mountain ash forests.