<p>This manuscript explores the evolving concept of trust in human-AI relationships through two empirical studies conducted in complementary domains. As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into high-stakes decision-making domains such as healthcare and employment, we examine how trust manifests along two key dimensions: functional (related to capability and performance) and relational (related to social desirability and sincerity). Study 1, based on previously published analyses (Oh &amp; Jung,&#xa0;<CitationRef CitationID="CR31">2023</CitationRef>), examines public perceptions of AI's technological capability and social desirability in replacing human workers across 100 occupations, drawing on responses from a U.S.-based sample. Study 2 explores how different types of diagnostic uncertainty, epistemic and aleatory, communicated by medical AI chatbots affect perceived credibility and sincerity. Together, the findings underscore that trust in AI is deeply context-dependent, influenced by perceived competence, communication style, and user expectations. The manuscript contributes to understanding trust as involving both functional and relational dimensions in human–AI interaction, with implications for AI system design and user engagement.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Rethinking trust in AI: empirical insights from labor and healthcare domains

  • Younbo Jung,
  • Poong Oh,
  • Jiajing Zhai

摘要

This manuscript explores the evolving concept of trust in human-AI relationships through two empirical studies conducted in complementary domains. As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into high-stakes decision-making domains such as healthcare and employment, we examine how trust manifests along two key dimensions: functional (related to capability and performance) and relational (related to social desirability and sincerity). Study 1, based on previously published analyses (Oh & Jung, 2023), examines public perceptions of AI's technological capability and social desirability in replacing human workers across 100 occupations, drawing on responses from a U.S.-based sample. Study 2 explores how different types of diagnostic uncertainty, epistemic and aleatory, communicated by medical AI chatbots affect perceived credibility and sincerity. Together, the findings underscore that trust in AI is deeply context-dependent, influenced by perceived competence, communication style, and user expectations. The manuscript contributes to understanding trust as involving both functional and relational dimensions in human–AI interaction, with implications for AI system design and user engagement.