<p>The Brazilian semiarid region, characterized by the Caatinga biome, faces increasing challenges due to climate change, including rising temperatures, irregular rainfall, and land degradation. Limited water availability and soil salinization further constrain agricultural productivity, highlighting the need for salt-tolerant forage alternatives. This study evaluated <i>Moringa oleifera</i> and <i>Calotropis procera</i> as potential forage sources by assessing their biomass production, crude protein content, and mineral composition under saline and non-saline conditions in a greenhouse experiment. <i>M. oleifera</i> produced 14 tons/ha of shoot dry matter, maintaining higher crude protein content (22.01 ± 5.45%) compared to <i>C. procera</i> (18.12 ± 4.42%). In contrast, <i>C. procera</i> exhibited greater resilience to saline irrigation, increasing its biomass production from 3.9 tons/ha to 9.3 tons/ha, while both species yielded 8.8 tons/ha under combined saline soil and water conditions. These results highlight <i>M. oleifera</i> as a superior protein-rich forage, while <i>C. procera</i> remains a promising fiber source, particularly in highly saline environments. Future research should focus in-situ evaluations and optimizing cultivation strategies to maximize their nutritional value and forage sustainability in semiarid regions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Assessing the potential of two alternative forage for saline semiarid regions in Brazil

  • Mirelio F. da Silva,
  • Alice F. Pedrozo,
  • Antonio Gilvan da C. de Souza,
  • Danilo B. Nogueira,
  • A. B. Giroldo

摘要

The Brazilian semiarid region, characterized by the Caatinga biome, faces increasing challenges due to climate change, including rising temperatures, irregular rainfall, and land degradation. Limited water availability and soil salinization further constrain agricultural productivity, highlighting the need for salt-tolerant forage alternatives. This study evaluated Moringa oleifera and Calotropis procera as potential forage sources by assessing their biomass production, crude protein content, and mineral composition under saline and non-saline conditions in a greenhouse experiment. M. oleifera produced 14 tons/ha of shoot dry matter, maintaining higher crude protein content (22.01 ± 5.45%) compared to C. procera (18.12 ± 4.42%). In contrast, C. procera exhibited greater resilience to saline irrigation, increasing its biomass production from 3.9 tons/ha to 9.3 tons/ha, while both species yielded 8.8 tons/ha under combined saline soil and water conditions. These results highlight M. oleifera as a superior protein-rich forage, while C. procera remains a promising fiber source, particularly in highly saline environments. Future research should focus in-situ evaluations and optimizing cultivation strategies to maximize their nutritional value and forage sustainability in semiarid regions.