Scholarlink

<p>Seaweed farming is increasingly promoted as a nature-based solution for marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR), offering the dual promise of climate mitigation and ecosystem enhancement. However, here we highlight a fundamental paradox: while macroalgae cultivation can significantly boost carbon sequestration and support biodiversity, it also introduces site-specific ecological risks—most notably eutrophication, hypoxia, and acidification—particularly in semi-enclosed coastal systems with limited water exchange. We synthesize current understanding of both the positive and negative impacts of large-scale macroalgae farming, examining pathways of carbon uptake, storage, and export alongside biogeochemical and food web disruptions. Critically, we identify the overlooked roles of hydrodynamic conditions and benthic-pelagic coupling in mediating ecological outcomes. To ensure that macroalgae aquaculture contributes effectively to climate goals while safeguarding coastal ecosystem resilience, we call for the development of a targeted and comprehensive evaluation framework capable of accurately assessing its impacts on adjacent waters. Such a framework should incorporate site-specific water-exchange characteristics and biogeochemical vulnerability, thereby enabling more informed and adaptive management strategies—including hydrodynamically guided site zoning—to support sustainable, long-term ecosystem benefits.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Reassessing the climate mitigation benefits and environmental risks of coastal seaweed farming

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月18日

查看全文
  • Yingxu Wu,
  • Yanmei Liu,
  • Di Qi

摘要

Seaweed farming is increasingly promoted as a nature-based solution for marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR), offering the dual promise of climate mitigation and ecosystem enhancement. However, here we highlight a fundamental paradox: while macroalgae cultivation can significantly boost carbon sequestration and support biodiversity, it also introduces site-specific ecological risks—most notably eutrophication, hypoxia, and acidification—particularly in semi-enclosed coastal systems with limited water exchange. We synthesize current understanding of both the positive and negative impacts of large-scale macroalgae farming, examining pathways of carbon uptake, storage, and export alongside biogeochemical and food web disruptions. Critically, we identify the overlooked roles of hydrodynamic conditions and benthic-pelagic coupling in mediating ecological outcomes. To ensure that macroalgae aquaculture contributes effectively to climate goals while safeguarding coastal ecosystem resilience, we call for the development of a targeted and comprehensive evaluation framework capable of accurately assessing its impacts on adjacent waters. Such a framework should incorporate site-specific water-exchange characteristics and biogeochemical vulnerability, thereby enabling more informed and adaptive management strategies—including hydrodynamically guided site zoning—to support sustainable, long-term ecosystem benefits.