Scholarlink

<p>Indonesia occupies a distinctive position in the global refugee protection regime as a non-signatory to the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol. Despite the absence of formal treaty obligations, the country continues to host thousands of refugees and asylum seekers. This paper examines the extent to which the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) provides a normative framework for Indonesia’s refugee protection policies. Using a normative legal research approach, the study analyzes international human rights instruments, domestic legal frameworks, and institutional practices. It argues that while the UDHR plays an important role in shaping Indonesia’s humanitarian approach, its non-binding nature limits its effectiveness as a comprehensive substitute for refugee law. The paper concludes that Indonesia’s reliance on general human rights norms creates both opportunities and constraints, and it calls for strengthened legal frameworks to ensure more consistent and rights-based protection for refugees.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The relevance of the UDHR in framing Indonesia’s refugee protection outside the 1951 and 1967 frameworks

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月21日

查看全文
  • Mochamad Kevin Romadhona,
  • Sri Endah Kinasih,
  • Rachmat Dimas Oktafenanda,
  • Eni Sugiarti,
  • Alaa Basil Baqer Alfadhel

摘要

Indonesia occupies a distinctive position in the global refugee protection regime as a non-signatory to the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol. Despite the absence of formal treaty obligations, the country continues to host thousands of refugees and asylum seekers. This paper examines the extent to which the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) provides a normative framework for Indonesia’s refugee protection policies. Using a normative legal research approach, the study analyzes international human rights instruments, domestic legal frameworks, and institutional practices. It argues that while the UDHR plays an important role in shaping Indonesia’s humanitarian approach, its non-binding nature limits its effectiveness as a comprehensive substitute for refugee law. The paper concludes that Indonesia’s reliance on general human rights norms creates both opportunities and constraints, and it calls for strengthened legal frameworks to ensure more consistent and rights-based protection for refugees.