<p>This study investigates the operational efficiency of actors within Kenya’s cage tilapia value chain governance using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) framework. The analysis of 560 participants across six value chain segments reveals a hierarchical governance structure dominated by traders (45.18%) and consumers (30.18%), with primary producers (11.79%) and processors (5%) holding smaller shares. Efficiency scores highlight significant variations: consumers demonstrate the highest efficiency (mean score of 0.824), followed by support enterprises (0.782) and input suppliers (0.754). Processors and producers exhibit moderate efficiency levels (0.583 and 0.589 respectively), while traders show the lowest efficiency (0.463) despite their market dominance. Transaction costs vary widely across actors, with producers (Ksh. 272,455) and input suppliers (Ksh. 206,045) facing the highest costs. The regression analysis reveals that transaction costs positively correlate with efficiency (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), while government regulatory frameworks and demographic factors significantly influence performance. To enhance value chain efficiency, targeted interventions in processing and trading are recommended, including investments in technology, infrastructure and policy measures to reduce transaction costs through improved supply chain management.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Value chain governance and operational efficiency of cage tilapia value chain in the riparian counties of Kenya’s Lake Victoria

  • Martin Abwao,
  • Hillary Bett,
  • Edith Gathungu

摘要

This study investigates the operational efficiency of actors within Kenya’s cage tilapia value chain governance using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) framework. The analysis of 560 participants across six value chain segments reveals a hierarchical governance structure dominated by traders (45.18%) and consumers (30.18%), with primary producers (11.79%) and processors (5%) holding smaller shares. Efficiency scores highlight significant variations: consumers demonstrate the highest efficiency (mean score of 0.824), followed by support enterprises (0.782) and input suppliers (0.754). Processors and producers exhibit moderate efficiency levels (0.583 and 0.589 respectively), while traders show the lowest efficiency (0.463) despite their market dominance. Transaction costs vary widely across actors, with producers (Ksh. 272,455) and input suppliers (Ksh. 206,045) facing the highest costs. The regression analysis reveals that transaction costs positively correlate with efficiency (p < 0.01), while government regulatory frameworks and demographic factors significantly influence performance. To enhance value chain efficiency, targeted interventions in processing and trading are recommended, including investments in technology, infrastructure and policy measures to reduce transaction costs through improved supply chain management.