Scholarlink

Background <p>Conservation agriculture has emerged as a critical strategy for enhancing agricultural productivity, resilience, and food security amidst climate variability in Sub-Saharan Africa. The <i>Pfumvudza/Intwasa</i> initiative promotes conservation agriculture practices among smallholder farmers and aligns with national policies such as the National Agriculture Policy Framework (2019–2030), the Climate-Smart Agriculture Policy (2018), and the National Development Strategy 1 (2021–2025). These policies provide essential guidelines for implementation, resource allocation, and support systems. Aim: This review critically examines the role of government policies and institutional frameworks in sustaining conservation agriculture practices in Zimbabwe, with a focus on the <i>Pfumvudza/Intwasa</i> programme. Method: A systematic literature review was conducted, analyzing peer-reviewed articles, policy documents, and government reports published between 2000 and 2024. Boolean operators and an inclusion criterion ensured a comprehensive exploration of themes such as climate resilience, policy alignment, and institutional effectiveness. Results: The findings reveal both strengths and limitations in existing policies and frameworks. While the policies emphasize conservation agriculture, inclusive participation, and resource distribution, challenges such as inadequate institutional coordination, limited extension services, and funding constraints undermine the sustainability of the <i>Pfumvudza/Intwasa</i> programme. Misalignment among policies, inefficiencies in resource allocation, and political interference further limit the program’s reach and effectiveness. Conclusion: The review concludes that government policies have successfully laid a foundation for integrating conservation agriculture into Zimbabwe’s agricultural landscape, enhancing smallholder resilience and productivity. However, persistent challenges in implementation require urgent attention. Strengthening institutional capacity, improving coordination among stakeholders, and addressing resource gaps are critical to ensuring the program’s long-term success. Recommendation: The review recommends policy harmonization, targeted investments in extension services, and the promotion of equitable resource distribution. Additionally, leveraging technology for monitoring, enhancing market access for smallholders, and fostering public-private partnerships will support the scalability and sustainability of <i>Pfumvudza/Intwasa.</i> These measures will enhance Zimbabwe’s food security, climate resilience, and agricultural development goals.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Role of policies and institutional frameworks in sustaining conservation agriculture: a critical review of Pfumvudza/Intwasa programme in Zimbabwe

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月20日

查看全文
  • Susan Samukele Dube,
  • Munyaradzi Chitakira

摘要

Background

Conservation agriculture has emerged as a critical strategy for enhancing agricultural productivity, resilience, and food security amidst climate variability in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Pfumvudza/Intwasa initiative promotes conservation agriculture practices among smallholder farmers and aligns with national policies such as the National Agriculture Policy Framework (2019–2030), the Climate-Smart Agriculture Policy (2018), and the National Development Strategy 1 (2021–2025). These policies provide essential guidelines for implementation, resource allocation, and support systems. Aim: This review critically examines the role of government policies and institutional frameworks in sustaining conservation agriculture practices in Zimbabwe, with a focus on the Pfumvudza/Intwasa programme. Method: A systematic literature review was conducted, analyzing peer-reviewed articles, policy documents, and government reports published between 2000 and 2024. Boolean operators and an inclusion criterion ensured a comprehensive exploration of themes such as climate resilience, policy alignment, and institutional effectiveness. Results: The findings reveal both strengths and limitations in existing policies and frameworks. While the policies emphasize conservation agriculture, inclusive participation, and resource distribution, challenges such as inadequate institutional coordination, limited extension services, and funding constraints undermine the sustainability of the Pfumvudza/Intwasa programme. Misalignment among policies, inefficiencies in resource allocation, and political interference further limit the program’s reach and effectiveness. Conclusion: The review concludes that government policies have successfully laid a foundation for integrating conservation agriculture into Zimbabwe’s agricultural landscape, enhancing smallholder resilience and productivity. However, persistent challenges in implementation require urgent attention. Strengthening institutional capacity, improving coordination among stakeholders, and addressing resource gaps are critical to ensuring the program’s long-term success. Recommendation: The review recommends policy harmonization, targeted investments in extension services, and the promotion of equitable resource distribution. Additionally, leveraging technology for monitoring, enhancing market access for smallholders, and fostering public-private partnerships will support the scalability and sustainability of Pfumvudza/Intwasa. These measures will enhance Zimbabwe’s food security, climate resilience, and agricultural development goals.