Scholarlink

<p>The shift toward digital-first healthcare models presents both opportunities and challenges for health systems worldwide. This case study critically examines the evolution of eMed GP at Hand (formerly Babylon GP at Hand) within the NHS, tracing its journey from an innovative digital provider to the largest GP practice in England, and ultimately, its downsizing. By bringing together an analysis of reviews, media coverage, and existing research, the study evaluates the model’s impact on accessibility, continuity of care, and health inequalities. Findings reveal that while the digital-first approach improved access for younger, healthier populations, it inadequately served vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and those with complex conditions. The study also highlights systemic challenges, such as limitations in Babylon’s business model, regulatory gaps in digital health oversight, and the complexities of integrating private sector innovation within public healthcare systems. These insights emphasise the necessity for robust regulation, tailored digital solutions, and a complementary relationship between digital and traditional care models to ensure sustainable and equitable healthcare delivery.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A systemic longitudinal case study of the eMed GP at hand digital first primary care model

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月5日

查看全文
  • Iqra Shahzad,
  • Melanie King

摘要

The shift toward digital-first healthcare models presents both opportunities and challenges for health systems worldwide. This case study critically examines the evolution of eMed GP at Hand (formerly Babylon GP at Hand) within the NHS, tracing its journey from an innovative digital provider to the largest GP practice in England, and ultimately, its downsizing. By bringing together an analysis of reviews, media coverage, and existing research, the study evaluates the model’s impact on accessibility, continuity of care, and health inequalities. Findings reveal that while the digital-first approach improved access for younger, healthier populations, it inadequately served vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and those with complex conditions. The study also highlights systemic challenges, such as limitations in Babylon’s business model, regulatory gaps in digital health oversight, and the complexities of integrating private sector innovation within public healthcare systems. These insights emphasise the necessity for robust regulation, tailored digital solutions, and a complementary relationship between digital and traditional care models to ensure sustainable and equitable healthcare delivery.