Scholarlink

<p>Somalia’s Essential Package of Health Services (EPHS) provides basic health interventions, especially for maternal and child health. However, its success depends on equitable funding across regions and programs. Somalia’s health financing is dominated by external donors and high household out-of-pocket spending, raising concerns that resources may not align with population needs. We analyzed EPHS funding from 2021–2026 by program area and by region to assess whether allocation reflected health needs and equity goals. Over 90% of EPHS funds during this period came from international donors, while the government contributed less than 10%. More than half of the funding supported reproductive, maternal, and newborn health, whereas other essential services—child health, communicable disease control, first aid and emergency care, and treatment of common illnesses—each received only about 5–15%. Programs for chronic diseases and mental health received negligible funding (combined 5%). Per capita funding varied greatly by region: relatively stable regions (Somaliland, Puntland, and Banadir/Mogadishu) had about two to three times more funding per person than conflict-affected states (e.g., Southwest and Hirshabelle). Some of the least-funded regions also had the worst health outcomes, including the highest under-five mortality rates. We observed an inverse correlation between per capita funding and under-five mortality across regions, indicating that higher-need areas were often under-resourced. Qualitative interviews with policymakers and donors reinforced that funding tends to flow to more secure, accessible regions, leaving insecure communities underserved. These findings reveal notable inequities in how health funds are distributed in Somalia. Without deliberate corrective measures, the current funding patterns may perpetuate or worsen health disparities. Policymakers and partners should strengthen coordination and adopt needs-based allocation strategies to ensure that Somalia’s limited health resources are distributed more equitably across both regions and health programs, advancing progress toward universal health coverage.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Equity in health funding: an analysis of the essential package of health services (EPHS) in Somalia (2021–2026)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月12日

查看全文
  • Khalid Mohamed Mohamud

摘要

Somalia’s Essential Package of Health Services (EPHS) provides basic health interventions, especially for maternal and child health. However, its success depends on equitable funding across regions and programs. Somalia’s health financing is dominated by external donors and high household out-of-pocket spending, raising concerns that resources may not align with population needs. We analyzed EPHS funding from 2021–2026 by program area and by region to assess whether allocation reflected health needs and equity goals. Over 90% of EPHS funds during this period came from international donors, while the government contributed less than 10%. More than half of the funding supported reproductive, maternal, and newborn health, whereas other essential services—child health, communicable disease control, first aid and emergency care, and treatment of common illnesses—each received only about 5–15%. Programs for chronic diseases and mental health received negligible funding (combined 5%). Per capita funding varied greatly by region: relatively stable regions (Somaliland, Puntland, and Banadir/Mogadishu) had about two to three times more funding per person than conflict-affected states (e.g., Southwest and Hirshabelle). Some of the least-funded regions also had the worst health outcomes, including the highest under-five mortality rates. We observed an inverse correlation between per capita funding and under-five mortality across regions, indicating that higher-need areas were often under-resourced. Qualitative interviews with policymakers and donors reinforced that funding tends to flow to more secure, accessible regions, leaving insecure communities underserved. These findings reveal notable inequities in how health funds are distributed in Somalia. Without deliberate corrective measures, the current funding patterns may perpetuate or worsen health disparities. Policymakers and partners should strengthen coordination and adopt needs-based allocation strategies to ensure that Somalia’s limited health resources are distributed more equitably across both regions and health programs, advancing progress toward universal health coverage.