Scholarlink

<p>This is a contribution to a symposium on David Liebesman and Ofra Magidor’s book <i>Property Versatility and Copredication</i>. It was originally presented, in compressed version, at the 2026 Eastern APA. I agree with their big picture metaphysical view, but quibble at four points about its application to social metaphysics. First, Liebesman and Magidor argue that abstract objects can have paradigmatically physical properties like being on shelves. I agree, and suggest they should accept the converse claim, that physical objects can have properties usually associated with abstracta. Second, I argue that there are several puzzles about how their view applied to books of variable granularity, like multi-volume works, or volumes containing several books. Third, I argue (against their preferred view of schools) that schools can come in different levels of granularity. Finally, I argue that ‘restaurant’ and ‘coffee shop’ can sometimes pick out physical objects. Liebesman and Magidor argue that these terms don’t pick out buildings, and I agree. But, I claim, they do sometimes pick out physical locations.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Books, schools, and restaurants

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月29日

查看全文
  • Brian Weatherson

摘要

This is a contribution to a symposium on David Liebesman and Ofra Magidor’s book Property Versatility and Copredication. It was originally presented, in compressed version, at the 2026 Eastern APA. I agree with their big picture metaphysical view, but quibble at four points about its application to social metaphysics. First, Liebesman and Magidor argue that abstract objects can have paradigmatically physical properties like being on shelves. I agree, and suggest they should accept the converse claim, that physical objects can have properties usually associated with abstracta. Second, I argue that there are several puzzles about how their view applied to books of variable granularity, like multi-volume works, or volumes containing several books. Third, I argue (against their preferred view of schools) that schools can come in different levels of granularity. Finally, I argue that ‘restaurant’ and ‘coffee shop’ can sometimes pick out physical objects. Liebesman and Magidor argue that these terms don’t pick out buildings, and I agree. But, I claim, they do sometimes pick out physical locations.