Scholarlink

<p>In their perceptive and constructive discussion of <i>Scientific Testimony</i>, Gelfert and Schneider articulate important challenges regarding simplification of public scientific testimony. In this response, I argue that while proper simplification is a hard task with many pitfalls, it is a task that may be guided by the science communication strategy—<i>Justification Reporting</i>—that I set forth in the book.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

How to simplify public scientific testimony? Response to Gelfert and Schneider

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月21日

查看全文
  • Mikkel Gerken

摘要

In their perceptive and constructive discussion of Scientific Testimony, Gelfert and Schneider articulate important challenges regarding simplification of public scientific testimony. In this response, I argue that while proper simplification is a hard task with many pitfalls, it is a task that may be guided by the science communication strategy—Justification Reporting—that I set forth in the book.