<p>The exegetical methodology of Filippo Casati’s <i>Heidegger and the Contradiction of Being: An Analytic Interpretation of the Late Heidegger</i> could be seen as exemplary not just in studies on Heidegger’s philosophy of logic but more broadly for the wider field that studies the non-classical reasoning of any continental philosopher. Like Casati’s book, many of these other studies argue for a non-trivial dialetheic interpretation of a continental philosopher and thus for the aptness of a paraconsistent formalization of their theories. One way that Casati’s method goes beyond these others is with its exegetical test for non-trivialism, which could possibly serve as a model for these other studies to strengthen their case for paraconsistency. Yet, some have argued that other continental philosophers are logical pluralists, which could raise questions about how to apply Casati’s techniques in such cases.</p>