Scholarlink

<p>Grounded in resource-based and appraisal frameworks, this study investigates how personality traits, workplace climate, and contextual perceptions jointly predict psychological well-being and work engagement among public service employees during martial law. Using a cross-sectional survey of 1667 Ukrainian public sector workers in wartime, hierarchical ordinal regression and moderation analyses were employed to assess predictors of well-being and engagement, supplemented by Kruskal–Wallis and ANOVA tests to explore group differences in engagement and emotional stability across martial law appraisals. Emotional stability emerged as the most robust predictor of psychological well-being, while conscientiousness and openness were linked to higher engagement. Workplace atmosphere positively influenced both outcomes, whereas salary adequacy was associated only with well-being. Moderation results indicated that appraisals of martial law significantly shaped the engagement–well-being relationship, with favorable appraisals linked to reduced reliance on engagement and higher emotional stability. These findings integrate perspectives on trait resilience, workplace resources, and meaning-focused coping, extending established theoretical models to a wartime context and offering practical insights for resilience-building interventions and mission-oriented organizational strategies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The role of personality traits and socio-psychological factors in well-being and employee engagement during martial law

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月9日

查看全文
  • Vitalii Shymko

摘要

Grounded in resource-based and appraisal frameworks, this study investigates how personality traits, workplace climate, and contextual perceptions jointly predict psychological well-being and work engagement among public service employees during martial law. Using a cross-sectional survey of 1667 Ukrainian public sector workers in wartime, hierarchical ordinal regression and moderation analyses were employed to assess predictors of well-being and engagement, supplemented by Kruskal–Wallis and ANOVA tests to explore group differences in engagement and emotional stability across martial law appraisals. Emotional stability emerged as the most robust predictor of psychological well-being, while conscientiousness and openness were linked to higher engagement. Workplace atmosphere positively influenced both outcomes, whereas salary adequacy was associated only with well-being. Moderation results indicated that appraisals of martial law significantly shaped the engagement–well-being relationship, with favorable appraisals linked to reduced reliance on engagement and higher emotional stability. These findings integrate perspectives on trait resilience, workplace resources, and meaning-focused coping, extending established theoretical models to a wartime context and offering practical insights for resilience-building interventions and mission-oriented organizational strategies.