Scholarlink

<p>This retrospective study scientifically evaluated nitrous oxide sedation procedures performed in a specialized university paediatric dentistry setting and their success rates in paediatric patients. A total of 192 patients and 337 treatments were analyzed. At the patient level, treatment was considered as optimally successful in 85.9 % of cases and in 89.6 % of individual procedures. Adverse effects such as hyperventilation and vomiting were rare (n = 2). Significant factors reducing treatment success included presence of high caries risk (dmft &gt; age [p = 0.014] and according to health insurance guidelines [p = 0.006], respectively) and children treated by different clinicians (p = 0.005). Age, gender, number of nitrous oxide treatments performed, dental treatment experience of the children, and radiographic diagnostics showed no significant impact (p &gt; 0.05). At the treatment level, planned restorative procedures showed a significant relation to success (p = 0.03) compared to nitrous oxide treatments without planned restorative procedures. However, surgical and endodontic treatments were not related to success (p &gt; 0.05). Nitrous oxide has proven to be an effective, safe, and versatile tool in paediatric dentistry, enhancing children's treatment experience, improving compliance, and serving as a valuable adjunct to various dental procedures.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Was beeinflusst den Erfolg von Lachgasbehandlungen bei Kindern?

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月12日

查看全文
  • Sofia Raevskaia,
  • Julian Schmoeckel,
  • Ruth M. Santamaría

摘要

This retrospective study scientifically evaluated nitrous oxide sedation procedures performed in a specialized university paediatric dentistry setting and their success rates in paediatric patients. A total of 192 patients and 337 treatments were analyzed. At the patient level, treatment was considered as optimally successful in 85.9 % of cases and in 89.6 % of individual procedures. Adverse effects such as hyperventilation and vomiting were rare (n = 2). Significant factors reducing treatment success included presence of high caries risk (dmft > age [p = 0.014] and according to health insurance guidelines [p = 0.006], respectively) and children treated by different clinicians (p = 0.005). Age, gender, number of nitrous oxide treatments performed, dental treatment experience of the children, and radiographic diagnostics showed no significant impact (p > 0.05). At the treatment level, planned restorative procedures showed a significant relation to success (p = 0.03) compared to nitrous oxide treatments without planned restorative procedures. However, surgical and endodontic treatments were not related to success (p > 0.05). Nitrous oxide has proven to be an effective, safe, and versatile tool in paediatric dentistry, enhancing children's treatment experience, improving compliance, and serving as a valuable adjunct to various dental procedures.