<p>This commentary on a case argues that creating better procedural skills development curricula requires commitment from a wide range of people who can bring different perspectives, including on animal rights. Transparency should be promoted at every phase of course and curricular development and aim to help trainees improve their technical skills without sacrificing patients’ rights, disappointing cultural expectations, or compromising environmental health.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Whose input should inform training programs’ uses of nonhuman animals?

  • David Feinstein,
  • John Pawlowski

摘要

This commentary on a case argues that creating better procedural skills development curricula requires commitment from a wide range of people who can bring different perspectives, including on animal rights. Transparency should be promoted at every phase of course and curricular development and aim to help trainees improve their technical skills without sacrificing patients’ rights, disappointing cultural expectations, or compromising environmental health.