Scholarlink

Purpose <p>The purpose of this study was to identify specific simulated scenarios and events for surgeons that discretely and effectively measure non-technical skills (NTS) constructs and appropriately measure NTS using specific behavioral anchors.</p> Methods <p>Over the course of two rounds, experts in NTS accumulated a comprehensive list of simulated scenarios used at our institution to evaluate NTS. Utilizing a survey, experts were able to review scenarios, events, and behavioral anchors to evaluate their agreement with the appropriateness of the events and effectiveness of the anchors. Coefficient of variation (CV) was used to evaluate agreement between raters. The highest rated events were identified.</p> Results <p>The CV between raters was moderate, and further inspection revealed that 86% of event ratings had discordance within ± 1 point. The highest rated events in terms of appropriateness and behavioral anchor effectiveness evaluated surgeons’ leadership and communication.</p> Conclusions <p>In this study, experts identified three simulated events that isolate and discretely evaluate specific NTS among surgeons. In the future, these scenarios can be used to effectively evaluate surgeons’ NTS.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Development of simulation scenarios for surgeons’ non-technical skills evaluation

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月13日

查看全文
  • Nicholas E. Anton,
  • Brittany Anderson-Montoya,
  • Amy Holmstrom,
  • Marian Obuseh,
  • Yichuan Yan,
  • Payton M. Miller,
  • Wendy S. Li,
  • Qais AbuHasan,
  • Denny Yu,
  • Dimitrios Stefanidis

摘要

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify specific simulated scenarios and events for surgeons that discretely and effectively measure non-technical skills (NTS) constructs and appropriately measure NTS using specific behavioral anchors.

Methods

Over the course of two rounds, experts in NTS accumulated a comprehensive list of simulated scenarios used at our institution to evaluate NTS. Utilizing a survey, experts were able to review scenarios, events, and behavioral anchors to evaluate their agreement with the appropriateness of the events and effectiveness of the anchors. Coefficient of variation (CV) was used to evaluate agreement between raters. The highest rated events were identified.

Results

The CV between raters was moderate, and further inspection revealed that 86% of event ratings had discordance within ± 1 point. The highest rated events in terms of appropriateness and behavioral anchor effectiveness evaluated surgeons’ leadership and communication.

Conclusions

In this study, experts identified three simulated events that isolate and discretely evaluate specific NTS among surgeons. In the future, these scenarios can be used to effectively evaluate surgeons’ NTS.