Scholarlink

<p>A clinical perspectives conference (CPC) is an ethically reflected, hospital-based concept aimed at preventing overtreatment similar to advance care planning (ACP), which is internationally established in law and outpatient treatment. Both approaches are designed to avoid situations in which patients are treated against their actual or presumed wishes at the end of life or in acute crises. The dynamic adaptation of advance care dialogues to the course of illness is essential as well as a&#xa0;professional interface management, which ensures timely access to relevant information for all involved healthcare providers. In clinical practice, however, medical interventions are often guided solely by technical feasibility in the absence of awareness of realistic therapeutic goals, thereby prolonging suffering and postponing dying. Such actions are neither ethically justified nor legally permissible. The multiprofessional development of a&#xa0;joint indication fosters more sustainable decision-making while at the same time ensuring responsible allocation of resources.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Klinische Perspektiven Konferenz

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月29日

查看全文
  • Barbara Friesenecker,
  • Astrid Steinwendtner,
  • Sonja Fruhwald,
  • Helga Dier

摘要

A clinical perspectives conference (CPC) is an ethically reflected, hospital-based concept aimed at preventing overtreatment similar to advance care planning (ACP), which is internationally established in law and outpatient treatment. Both approaches are designed to avoid situations in which patients are treated against their actual or presumed wishes at the end of life or in acute crises. The dynamic adaptation of advance care dialogues to the course of illness is essential as well as a professional interface management, which ensures timely access to relevant information for all involved healthcare providers. In clinical practice, however, medical interventions are often guided solely by technical feasibility in the absence of awareness of realistic therapeutic goals, thereby prolonging suffering and postponing dying. Such actions are neither ethically justified nor legally permissible. The multiprofessional development of a joint indication fosters more sustainable decision-making while at the same time ensuring responsible allocation of resources.