Scholarlink

<p>Human-assisted Traditional Peer Review Intelligence (HATPRINT) plays a crucial role in advancing scientific discoveries through critical evaluation and expert insights by humans. However, the rise of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Peer Review Intelligence (AIPRINT), powered by Generative AI (Gen AI), including various forms of LLMs is likely to transform the peer review landscape. While Gen AI can enhance efficiency, automate reviews, and refine research, overreliance may risk losing innovation and perpetuate pseudo-peer review cycles. Several AI-assisted review systems, such as SciScore, Paperpal, and various other publishers in-house AI reviewer suggestion tools, suggest futurist dominance of AIPRINT over HATPRINT. These platforms could enhance, rather than replace, human evaluation by automating checks, improving writing, and aiding reviewer selection. Theoretically, their integration could lead to the growing convergence of HATPRINT and AIPRINT leading to a semi-autonomous peer review systems strongly underscoring the need for governance, transparency, and human oversight. We propose a balanced convergence of HATPRINT and AIPRINT to maintain scientific integrity, ensuring human expertise remains integral. However, explicit limitations are lack for empirical analysis in support of the proposed viewpoints. Future research should explore this equilibrium to sustain disruptive science while leveraging AI for enhanced accuracy, productivity, and the evolution of peer review.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Human-assisted traditional peer review intelligence vs artificial peer review intelligence: perspectives on future disruptive sciences

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月18日

查看全文
  • Nilesh Kumar Sharma,
  • Sachin C Sarode

摘要

Human-assisted Traditional Peer Review Intelligence (HATPRINT) plays a crucial role in advancing scientific discoveries through critical evaluation and expert insights by humans. However, the rise of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Peer Review Intelligence (AIPRINT), powered by Generative AI (Gen AI), including various forms of LLMs is likely to transform the peer review landscape. While Gen AI can enhance efficiency, automate reviews, and refine research, overreliance may risk losing innovation and perpetuate pseudo-peer review cycles. Several AI-assisted review systems, such as SciScore, Paperpal, and various other publishers in-house AI reviewer suggestion tools, suggest futurist dominance of AIPRINT over HATPRINT. These platforms could enhance, rather than replace, human evaluation by automating checks, improving writing, and aiding reviewer selection. Theoretically, their integration could lead to the growing convergence of HATPRINT and AIPRINT leading to a semi-autonomous peer review systems strongly underscoring the need for governance, transparency, and human oversight. We propose a balanced convergence of HATPRINT and AIPRINT to maintain scientific integrity, ensuring human expertise remains integral. However, explicit limitations are lack for empirical analysis in support of the proposed viewpoints. Future research should explore this equilibrium to sustain disruptive science while leveraging AI for enhanced accuracy, productivity, and the evolution of peer review.