Scholarlink

<p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly used worldwide to make decisions, be it by public administrations, industry, banks, or insurers. One area with a particularly high impact on citizens is its use in judiciary processes. To this day, there has been little investigation into why countries decide to adopt AI in this area. In this article, we show that the mere promise of efficiency gains is not enough of an explanation for why countries adopt AI within judiciary processes. Instead,&#xa0;we show that the administrative burden (as measured by the number of days to trial), a government’s leaning within the political spectrum (namely towards the left), and the level of adoption of technology by governments in neighboring countries predict countries’ announcement to adopt AI in their judiciary. Taken&#xa0;together, our findings&#xa0;derived from a data analysis of 28 advanced democracies constitute an important step towards a better understanding of the factors shaping AI’s integration into judiciary processes.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Adoption of artificial intelligence in the judiciary: a comparison of 28 advanced democracies

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月24日

查看全文
  • Clement Guitton,
  • Vlada Druta,
  • Markus Hinterleitner,
  • Aurelia Tamò-Larrieux,
  • Simon Mayer

摘要

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly used worldwide to make decisions, be it by public administrations, industry, banks, or insurers. One area with a particularly high impact on citizens is its use in judiciary processes. To this day, there has been little investigation into why countries decide to adopt AI in this area. In this article, we show that the mere promise of efficiency gains is not enough of an explanation for why countries adopt AI within judiciary processes. Instead, we show that the administrative burden (as measured by the number of days to trial), a government’s leaning within the political spectrum (namely towards the left), and the level of adoption of technology by governments in neighboring countries predict countries’ announcement to adopt AI in their judiciary. Taken together, our findings derived from a data analysis of 28 advanced democracies constitute an important step towards a better understanding of the factors shaping AI’s integration into judiciary processes.