Scholarlink

<p>I propose a three-stage account of the historical relationship between individuals and moral authority in Western modernity. In the first stage - the pre-modern - moral authority was external, institutionalised, and delegated: the rabbi, priest, or confessor told you what was right, and you asked. In the second stage - the modern, exemplified with particular clarity in Kafka’s The Trial - that authority collapsed. The individual was left alone, structurally responsible for moral self-governance under conditions of radical normative pluralism and institutional dissolution. This is the Kafkaesque condition: not the absence of judgment, but the absence of any institution positioned to deliver it. I argue that, in certain secular late-modern contexts, we are now entering a third stage, in which large language model AI systems are functioning, for users who knowingly and deliberately consult them, as a new form of external moral authority - what I call the rabbi-machine. This is distinct from the broader and more diffuse phenomenon of ambient AI normative influence - what I call the clerk-machine - which operates beneath conscious consultation and is addressed separately within the argument. For many secular late-modern users, including those who never had access to such authority in the traditional sense, and who found the therapeutic and deliberative resources of modernity inadequate to the task of moral clarity, AI offers something genuinely new: a responsive, non-judgmental, immediately available interlocutor willing to say what is right. Drawing on Weber, Bauman, and Kafka, and engaging the growing empirical literature on AI moral influence, I analyse the structural logic of this transition, its cultural preconditions, and the profound risks introduced by a moral authority that is opaque, commercially operated, and epistemically unaccountable. I further argue that the rabbi-machine’s authority fits none of Weber’s three classical types and propose a fourth category - statistical-consensual authority - to capture its distinctive basis. The return of the rabbi, I conclude, is not a restoration. It is a transformation - one that resolves the Kafkaesque condition by replacing it with a different and more subtle form of normative opacity.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

From Kafka to the rabbi-machine

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月30日

查看全文
  • Lior Gazit

摘要

I propose a three-stage account of the historical relationship between individuals and moral authority in Western modernity. In the first stage - the pre-modern - moral authority was external, institutionalised, and delegated: the rabbi, priest, or confessor told you what was right, and you asked. In the second stage - the modern, exemplified with particular clarity in Kafka’s The Trial - that authority collapsed. The individual was left alone, structurally responsible for moral self-governance under conditions of radical normative pluralism and institutional dissolution. This is the Kafkaesque condition: not the absence of judgment, but the absence of any institution positioned to deliver it. I argue that, in certain secular late-modern contexts, we are now entering a third stage, in which large language model AI systems are functioning, for users who knowingly and deliberately consult them, as a new form of external moral authority - what I call the rabbi-machine. This is distinct from the broader and more diffuse phenomenon of ambient AI normative influence - what I call the clerk-machine - which operates beneath conscious consultation and is addressed separately within the argument. For many secular late-modern users, including those who never had access to such authority in the traditional sense, and who found the therapeutic and deliberative resources of modernity inadequate to the task of moral clarity, AI offers something genuinely new: a responsive, non-judgmental, immediately available interlocutor willing to say what is right. Drawing on Weber, Bauman, and Kafka, and engaging the growing empirical literature on AI moral influence, I analyse the structural logic of this transition, its cultural preconditions, and the profound risks introduced by a moral authority that is opaque, commercially operated, and epistemically unaccountable. I further argue that the rabbi-machine’s authority fits none of Weber’s three classical types and propose a fourth category - statistical-consensual authority - to capture its distinctive basis. The return of the rabbi, I conclude, is not a restoration. It is a transformation - one that resolves the Kafkaesque condition by replacing it with a different and more subtle form of normative opacity.