<p>Circular waste governance requires institutional arrangements that integrate regulatory mandates, corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices, and collaborative processes, yet empirical evidence on their combined effect on public value remains limited, particularly in emerging economies. This study examines the direct and indirect effects of Regulation and CSR Practices on Public Value, with Collaborative Governance specified as a mediating variable. A quantitative explanatory design was employed, using survey data from 150 key actors in Indonesia’s circular waste sector, with data analyzed via regression and mediation techniques using SPSS and the PROCESS Macro. The results show that both Regulation and CSR Practices significantly enhance Public Value, with CSR exerting the stronger direct effect. Both antecedents also positively shape Collaborative Governance, which in turn significantly improves Public Value. Mediation testing confirms Collaborative Governance as a significant partial mediator, channeling a substantial portion of the influence from both Regulation and CSR into societal benefits. The inclusion of the mediator substantially increases the model’s explanatory power for Public Value. These findings demonstrate that regulatory structures and voluntary corporate actions are most effective when embedded within collaborative arrangements. The study advances hybrid governance theory by empirically validating the synergistic interaction of state, market, and network-based instruments and offers clear policy imperatives for strengthening integrated governance architectures to support circular transitions.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Governing Circular Waste for Public Value: Integrating Regulation, CSR Practices, and Collaborative Governance in an Emerging Economy

  • Amirul Mustofa,
  • Ika Devy Pramudiana,
  • Priyanto Priyanto,
  • Ilyas Masudin

摘要

Circular waste governance requires institutional arrangements that integrate regulatory mandates, corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices, and collaborative processes, yet empirical evidence on their combined effect on public value remains limited, particularly in emerging economies. This study examines the direct and indirect effects of Regulation and CSR Practices on Public Value, with Collaborative Governance specified as a mediating variable. A quantitative explanatory design was employed, using survey data from 150 key actors in Indonesia’s circular waste sector, with data analyzed via regression and mediation techniques using SPSS and the PROCESS Macro. The results show that both Regulation and CSR Practices significantly enhance Public Value, with CSR exerting the stronger direct effect. Both antecedents also positively shape Collaborative Governance, which in turn significantly improves Public Value. Mediation testing confirms Collaborative Governance as a significant partial mediator, channeling a substantial portion of the influence from both Regulation and CSR into societal benefits. The inclusion of the mediator substantially increases the model’s explanatory power for Public Value. These findings demonstrate that regulatory structures and voluntary corporate actions are most effective when embedded within collaborative arrangements. The study advances hybrid governance theory by empirically validating the synergistic interaction of state, market, and network-based instruments and offers clear policy imperatives for strengthening integrated governance architectures to support circular transitions.