Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Spine surgery is highly prone to litigation due to unpredictable functional outcomes and neurological complication risks, despite complication rates being lower than those of other orthopaedic subspecialities. Data on spine litigation dynamics in India are limited, with most studies originating from North America and China. We aimed to evaluate factors leading to litigation against spine surgeons in India, litigation outcomes, and lessons for reducing litigation risk.</p> Materials and Methods <p>A retrospective descriptive study was conducted by searching Indian Kanoon and confonet.nic.in for “spine surgery” judgements over 20&#xa0;years, yielding 69 eligible cases after exclusions. Variables studied included litigant demographics, disease aetiology, surgical details, alleged deficiencies, verdicts, compensation, hospital type, and surgeon speciality. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS with Chi-square tests for categorical data.</p> Results <p>Of 69 litigations, 69.5% of plaintiffs were male, and 92.75% of cases were against private practitioners. Orthopaedic surgeons were involved in 53.6% of cases, and neurosurgeons in 43.5%. Guilty verdicts occurred in 42% of cases. Common litigation triggers included postop neural deficits (30.4%), symptom non-relief (26%), delayed diagnosis (24.6%), and infection (23.2%). Wrong-level surgery had the highest likelihood of a guilty verdict (83%). Elective, basic spine surgeries, such as lumbar discectomy (46.9%), were most frequently litigated. The average compensation awarded was ₹8.27 lakh, significantly lower than the demands.</p> Conclusion <p>Recognising litigation trends and adopting comprehensive preoperative counselling, meticulous documentation, and prompt management of complications can reduce litigation risk while enhancing patient safety and care quality in spine surgery practice.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Litigation in Spine Surgery: Why Were We Sued? To What Results? What Can We Learn?

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月29日

查看全文
  • Aditya Banta,
  • Sandeep Kumar Yadav,
  • Rajesh Kumar Rajnish

摘要

Introduction

Spine surgery is highly prone to litigation due to unpredictable functional outcomes and neurological complication risks, despite complication rates being lower than those of other orthopaedic subspecialities. Data on spine litigation dynamics in India are limited, with most studies originating from North America and China. We aimed to evaluate factors leading to litigation against spine surgeons in India, litigation outcomes, and lessons for reducing litigation risk.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective descriptive study was conducted by searching Indian Kanoon and confonet.nic.in for “spine surgery” judgements over 20 years, yielding 69 eligible cases after exclusions. Variables studied included litigant demographics, disease aetiology, surgical details, alleged deficiencies, verdicts, compensation, hospital type, and surgeon speciality. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS with Chi-square tests for categorical data.

Results

Of 69 litigations, 69.5% of plaintiffs were male, and 92.75% of cases were against private practitioners. Orthopaedic surgeons were involved in 53.6% of cases, and neurosurgeons in 43.5%. Guilty verdicts occurred in 42% of cases. Common litigation triggers included postop neural deficits (30.4%), symptom non-relief (26%), delayed diagnosis (24.6%), and infection (23.2%). Wrong-level surgery had the highest likelihood of a guilty verdict (83%). Elective, basic spine surgeries, such as lumbar discectomy (46.9%), were most frequently litigated. The average compensation awarded was ₹8.27 lakh, significantly lower than the demands.

Conclusion

Recognising litigation trends and adopting comprehensive preoperative counselling, meticulous documentation, and prompt management of complications can reduce litigation risk while enhancing patient safety and care quality in spine surgery practice.