Scholarlink

Purpose <p>The definition of jumbo acetabular cups for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is predominantly based on Western populations, with limited applicability to ethnic variations. Indian patients often exhibit distinct anatomical characteristics, necessitating population-specific guidelines to avoid complications such as excessive bone loss or suboptimal component fixation. This study aimed to establish jumbo cup dimensions for Indian patients and compare these findings with global standards.</p> Methods <p>This retrospective, multicenter observational study analyzed data from 2,372 primary THA patients across four high-volume orthopedic centers in India (2010–2023). Patient demographics, etiology, and acetabular component sizes were extracted from institutional registries. The jumbo cup was defined as 10&#xa0;mm larger than the mean acetabular component size. Statistical analyses, including one-way ANOVA and linear regression, were conducted to assess the influence of demographic and etiological factors on cup size.</p> Results <p>The mean acetabular cup size was 49.99&#xa0;mm (SD: 3.51). Male patients required significantly larger components (mean: 51.23&#xa0;mm) compared to females (mean: 47.21&#xa0;mm, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Based on the jumbo cup definition, thresholds were proposed as 62&#xa0;mm for men and 58&#xa0;mm for women. These dimensions are 2–4&#xa0;mm smaller than those recommended for Western populations. Etiology-specific differences were observed, with post-acetabular fractures requiring the largest cups (mean: 2.08&#xa0;mm increase, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p> Conclusion <p>This study highlights the need for ethnic-specific jumbo cup definitions in revision THA. The proposed dimensions for Indian patients provide a practical framework for preoperative planning, emphasizing the importance of personalized surgical strategies to enhance outcomes and reduce complications.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Jumbo Acetabular Cup in the Indian Population: Is It Time to Reconsider Existing Thresholds?

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月13日

查看全文
  • Akshaya Gadekar,
  • Adarsh Annapareddy,
  • Tarun Jayakumar,
  • Praharsha Mulpur,
  • Raja Bhaskara Rajasekaran,
  • Ravikumar Mukartihal,
  • Sharan S. Patil,
  • Vijay C. Bose,
  • Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran,
  • A V Gurava Reddy

摘要

Purpose

The definition of jumbo acetabular cups for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is predominantly based on Western populations, with limited applicability to ethnic variations. Indian patients often exhibit distinct anatomical characteristics, necessitating population-specific guidelines to avoid complications such as excessive bone loss or suboptimal component fixation. This study aimed to establish jumbo cup dimensions for Indian patients and compare these findings with global standards.

Methods

This retrospective, multicenter observational study analyzed data from 2,372 primary THA patients across four high-volume orthopedic centers in India (2010–2023). Patient demographics, etiology, and acetabular component sizes were extracted from institutional registries. The jumbo cup was defined as 10 mm larger than the mean acetabular component size. Statistical analyses, including one-way ANOVA and linear regression, were conducted to assess the influence of demographic and etiological factors on cup size.

Results

The mean acetabular cup size was 49.99 mm (SD: 3.51). Male patients required significantly larger components (mean: 51.23 mm) compared to females (mean: 47.21 mm, p < 0.001). Based on the jumbo cup definition, thresholds were proposed as 62 mm for men and 58 mm for women. These dimensions are 2–4 mm smaller than those recommended for Western populations. Etiology-specific differences were observed, with post-acetabular fractures requiring the largest cups (mean: 2.08 mm increase, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This study highlights the need for ethnic-specific jumbo cup definitions in revision THA. The proposed dimensions for Indian patients provide a practical framework for preoperative planning, emphasizing the importance of personalized surgical strategies to enhance outcomes and reduce complications.