Scholarlink

Objective <p>This study examines trends in USFDA’s authorized generic (AG) approvals from January 2019 to August 2024, focusing on approval patterns, leading therapeutic areas, dominant dosage forms, and key companies. The research aims to highlight market dynamics and the role of AGs in enhancing healthcare accessibility and affordability with case studies.</p> Methods <p>Data was collected from the FDA’s list of authorized generic drugs and analyzed to identify trends in annual approvals, therapeutic areas, and dosage forms. A company-wise analysis was conducted to identify top performers, with a detailed evaluation of their approval trends and strategic focus areas across therapeutic categories. Recent case studies of AGs were included to explore their clinical and economic significance. The impact of the Inflation Reduction Act, Continuing Appropriations Act, of 2020, and Health Extenders Act of 2019 on the definition and pricing of AGs, as well as its implications for the pharmaceutical industry and Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, were examined.</p> Results <p>AG approvals peaked in 2019 (31%) and 2020 (33%), then declined. Leading therapeutic areas were cardiovascular (18%), neurology (14%), and endocrinology (13%). Tablets comprised 35% of approvals, followed by capsules (23%) and solutions (9%). GlaxoSmithKline led with 7% of approvals, primarily in pulmonology and migraine, while Bausch Health (6.25%) focused on dermatology and endocrinology. IBSA Pharma (5.47%) excelled in endocrinology and pain management. Pfizer and Cediprof each had 4.69%, with Pfizer focusing on cardiovascular and infectious diseases, and Cediprof specializing in endocrinology. Recent case studies of AGs provided an affordable, effective alternative for diabetes and cardiovascular care.</p> Conclusion <p>AGs effectively bridge the transition from branded to generic drugs, supporting broader access to treatment, cost efficiency, and ongoing innovation in the pharmaceutical sector. The analysis highlights AGs’ significant role in addressing healthcare needs while underscoring challenges like exclusivity agreements and profit constraints for traditional generics. These findings affirm AGs as pivotal in advancing pharmaceutical market dynamics and healthcare affordability.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Navigating the Trends in USFDA Authorized Generic Approvals (2019–2024): Enhancing Healthcare Accessibility and Affordability

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月22日

查看全文
  • M. Sowndharya,
  • Ramesh Joga,
  • Kajal Gandhi,
  • Gadekar Kailas Vijay,
  • Sonali Waikar,
  • Sravani Yerram,
  • Rajeev Singh Raghuvanshi,
  • Saurabh Srivastava

摘要

Objective

This study examines trends in USFDA’s authorized generic (AG) approvals from January 2019 to August 2024, focusing on approval patterns, leading therapeutic areas, dominant dosage forms, and key companies. The research aims to highlight market dynamics and the role of AGs in enhancing healthcare accessibility and affordability with case studies.

Methods

Data was collected from the FDA’s list of authorized generic drugs and analyzed to identify trends in annual approvals, therapeutic areas, and dosage forms. A company-wise analysis was conducted to identify top performers, with a detailed evaluation of their approval trends and strategic focus areas across therapeutic categories. Recent case studies of AGs were included to explore their clinical and economic significance. The impact of the Inflation Reduction Act, Continuing Appropriations Act, of 2020, and Health Extenders Act of 2019 on the definition and pricing of AGs, as well as its implications for the pharmaceutical industry and Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, were examined.

Results

AG approvals peaked in 2019 (31%) and 2020 (33%), then declined. Leading therapeutic areas were cardiovascular (18%), neurology (14%), and endocrinology (13%). Tablets comprised 35% of approvals, followed by capsules (23%) and solutions (9%). GlaxoSmithKline led with 7% of approvals, primarily in pulmonology and migraine, while Bausch Health (6.25%) focused on dermatology and endocrinology. IBSA Pharma (5.47%) excelled in endocrinology and pain management. Pfizer and Cediprof each had 4.69%, with Pfizer focusing on cardiovascular and infectious diseases, and Cediprof specializing in endocrinology. Recent case studies of AGs provided an affordable, effective alternative for diabetes and cardiovascular care.

Conclusion

AGs effectively bridge the transition from branded to generic drugs, supporting broader access to treatment, cost efficiency, and ongoing innovation in the pharmaceutical sector. The analysis highlights AGs’ significant role in addressing healthcare needs while underscoring challenges like exclusivity agreements and profit constraints for traditional generics. These findings affirm AGs as pivotal in advancing pharmaceutical market dynamics and healthcare affordability.