<p>Gas to liquids (GTL) is the process of converting natural gas into synthetic fuel, which can be refined into various fuels and hydrocarbon-based products. This study investigates the impact of CO<sub>2</sub> capture on the environmental and economic performance of the GTL process, considering its high energy demands and associated greenhouse gas emissions. Specifically, we explore the effective integration of CO<sub>2</sub> within a GTL process employing a 15 wt% Co/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> catalyst. The key process units analyzed include syngas production, Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, CO<sub>2</sub> capture, and hydrogen separation. Six scenarios were evaluated: one without a CO<sub>2</sub> capture unit and five with the CO<sub>2</sub> capture unit placed at different locations within the GTL process. The analysis focuses on optimizing these scenarios to identify the best configuration.Results from the techno-economic-environmental analysis indicate that the scenario excluding the CO<sub>2</sub> capture unit achieved the lowest CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, highest carbon and thermal efficiencies, and greatest economic viability. This outcome underscores that, in this context, the primary function of CO<sub>2</sub> capture is to adjust the H<sub>2</sub>/CO molar ratio for the Fischer-Tropsch reactor rather than to reduce CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Thus, while CO<sub>2</sub> capture can alter the stoichiometry, it can lead to increased emissions in terms of overall plant performance. Furthermore, if CO<sub>2</sub> capture is deemed necessary, the optimal configuration is to position the capture unit after syngas production, resulting in a recovery of approximately 71% of CO<sub>2</sub>. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the costs of implementing and operating CO<sub>2</sub> capture systems may outweigh their economic benefits, further complicating efforts to reduce emissions. This data calls for reconsideration of the environmental analysis aspect in the manuscript’s title, given that the analysis is driven more by stoichiometric concerns than by environmental objectives.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Assessing the impact of CO2 capture on the techno-economic performance of integrated Gas-to-Liquid (GTL) processes

  • Jafar Sadeghzadeh Ahari,
  • Mehdi Koolivand Salooki

摘要

Gas to liquids (GTL) is the process of converting natural gas into synthetic fuel, which can be refined into various fuels and hydrocarbon-based products. This study investigates the impact of CO2 capture on the environmental and economic performance of the GTL process, considering its high energy demands and associated greenhouse gas emissions. Specifically, we explore the effective integration of CO2 within a GTL process employing a 15 wt% Co/Al2O3 catalyst. The key process units analyzed include syngas production, Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, CO2 capture, and hydrogen separation. Six scenarios were evaluated: one without a CO2 capture unit and five with the CO2 capture unit placed at different locations within the GTL process. The analysis focuses on optimizing these scenarios to identify the best configuration.Results from the techno-economic-environmental analysis indicate that the scenario excluding the CO2 capture unit achieved the lowest CO2 emissions, highest carbon and thermal efficiencies, and greatest economic viability. This outcome underscores that, in this context, the primary function of CO2 capture is to adjust the H2/CO molar ratio for the Fischer-Tropsch reactor rather than to reduce CO2 emissions. Thus, while CO2 capture can alter the stoichiometry, it can lead to increased emissions in terms of overall plant performance. Furthermore, if CO2 capture is deemed necessary, the optimal configuration is to position the capture unit after syngas production, resulting in a recovery of approximately 71% of CO2. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the costs of implementing and operating CO2 capture systems may outweigh their economic benefits, further complicating efforts to reduce emissions. This data calls for reconsideration of the environmental analysis aspect in the manuscript’s title, given that the analysis is driven more by stoichiometric concerns than by environmental objectives.