<p>The main results of this paper is two-fold. Firstly, let <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {A}\subset \mathbb {R}^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="script">A</mi> <mo>⊂</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> be a planar circular annulus and denote by <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {N}_{N}(\mathcal {A},\lambda )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">N</mi> <mi>N</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">A</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>λ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> the counting function of Neumann eigenvalues of Laplacian in <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {A}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">A</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. Pólya’s conjecture states that <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {N}_{N}(\mathcal {A},\lambda )\ge (4\pi )^{-1}|\mathcal {A}|\lambda ^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">N</mi> <mi>N</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">A</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>λ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>≥</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mi>π</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mi>λ</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and Kröger then proved that <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {N}_{N}(\mathcal {A},\lambda )\ge (8\pi )^{-1}|\mathcal {A}|\lambda ^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">N</mi> <mi>N</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">A</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>λ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>≥</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>8</mn> <mi>π</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">A</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mi>λ</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. In this paper, we prove that there exists a better estimate for <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {N}_{N}(\mathcal {A},\lambda )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">N</mi> <mi>N</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">A</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>λ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> than Kröger’s estimate. Also, we establish better estimates for Neumann eigenvalues of Laplacian in planar annular sectors. Secondly, we study the following boundary mean zero Laplacian eigenvalue problem with constant Neumann boundary data on unit disk <Equation ID="Equ55"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} -\Delta w=\kappa w \quad &amp; \hbox {in}\ \mathcal {D}, \\ \frac{\partial w}{\partial \vec {n}}=-\frac{\kappa }{P(\mathcal {D})}\int _{\mathcal {D}}w\,dx \quad &amp; \hbox {on}\ \partial \mathcal {D}, \\ \int _{\partial \mathcal {D}}w\,d\sigma =0, \ \ &amp; \, \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mfenced open="{"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>κ</mi> <mi>w</mi> <mspace width="1em" /> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mtext>in</mtext> <mspace width="4pt" /> <mi mathvariant="script">D</mi> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mrow /> <mfrac> <mrow> <mi>∂</mi> <mi>w</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>∂</mi> <mover accent="true"> <mi>n</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> </mover> </mrow> </mfrac> <mo>=</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mfrac> <mi>κ</mi> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">D</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mfrac> <msub> <mo>∫</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">D</mi> </msub> <mi>w</mi> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>d</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mspace width="1em" /> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mtext>on</mtext> <mspace width="4pt" /> <mi>∂</mi> <mi mathvariant="script">D</mi> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mrow> <mrow /> <msub> <mo>∫</mo> <mrow> <mi>∂</mi> <mi mathvariant="script">D</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mi>w</mi> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> <mi>d</mi> <mi>σ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="4pt" /> <mspace width="4pt" /> </mrow> </mtd> <mtd columnalign="left"> <mspace width="0.166667em" /> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </mfenced> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>where <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(P(\mathcal {D})\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">D</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> denotes the perimeter of <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {D}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="script">D</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. By establishing a conclusion similar as the famous Bourget’s hypothesis, we find all the eigenvalues about the above problem. Besides, we investigate the asymptotic distribution of this new type eigenvalue on disk. We prove that the corresponding Pólya’s conjecture for the counting function <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {N}_{CN}(\mathcal {D},\lambda )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">N</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">CN</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">D</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>λ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> fails for <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\lambda \in (0,\infty )\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>λ</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>∞</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and then find the precise range on parameter <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\lambda \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>λ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> that makes <InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\mathcal {N}_{CN}(\mathcal {D},\lambda )\ge \frac{1}{4}\lambda ^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi mathvariant="script">N</mi> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">CN</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi mathvariant="script">D</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>λ</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>≥</mo> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mn>4</mn> </mfrac> <msup> <mi>λ</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, i.e., the corresponding Pólya’s conjecture, valid. Also, we establish some asymptotic estimate for this new type of eigenvalues.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Some inequalities on Laplacian eigenvalues with Neumann type boundary data for planar disk and annulus

  • Zhen Song,
  • Wenming Zou

摘要

The main results of this paper is two-fold. Firstly, let \(\mathcal {A}\subset \mathbb {R}^2\) A R 2 be a planar circular annulus and denote by \(\mathcal {N}_{N}(\mathcal {A},\lambda )\) N N ( A , λ ) the counting function of Neumann eigenvalues of Laplacian in \(\mathcal {A}\) A . Pólya’s conjecture states that \(\mathcal {N}_{N}(\mathcal {A},\lambda )\ge (4\pi )^{-1}|\mathcal {A}|\lambda ^2\) N N ( A , λ ) ( 4 π ) - 1 | A | λ 2 and Kröger then proved that \(\mathcal {N}_{N}(\mathcal {A},\lambda )\ge (8\pi )^{-1}|\mathcal {A}|\lambda ^2\) N N ( A , λ ) ( 8 π ) - 1 | A | λ 2 . In this paper, we prove that there exists a better estimate for \(\mathcal {N}_{N}(\mathcal {A},\lambda )\) N N ( A , λ ) than Kröger’s estimate. Also, we establish better estimates for Neumann eigenvalues of Laplacian in planar annular sectors. Secondly, we study the following boundary mean zero Laplacian eigenvalue problem with constant Neumann boundary data on unit disk \(\begin{aligned} {\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} -\Delta w=\kappa w \quad & \hbox {in}\ \mathcal {D}, \\ \frac{\partial w}{\partial \vec {n}}=-\frac{\kappa }{P(\mathcal {D})}\int _{\mathcal {D}}w\,dx \quad & \hbox {on}\ \partial \mathcal {D}, \\ \int _{\partial \mathcal {D}}w\,d\sigma =0, \ \ & \, \end{array}\right. } \end{aligned}\) - Δ w = κ w in D , w n = - κ P ( D ) D w d x on D , D w d σ = 0 , where \(P(\mathcal {D})\) P ( D ) denotes the perimeter of \(\mathcal {D}\) D . By establishing a conclusion similar as the famous Bourget’s hypothesis, we find all the eigenvalues about the above problem. Besides, we investigate the asymptotic distribution of this new type eigenvalue on disk. We prove that the corresponding Pólya’s conjecture for the counting function \(\mathcal {N}_{CN}(\mathcal {D},\lambda )\) N CN ( D , λ ) fails for \(\lambda \in (0,\infty )\) λ ( 0 , ) and then find the precise range on parameter \(\lambda \) λ that makes \(\mathcal {N}_{CN}(\mathcal {D},\lambda )\ge \frac{1}{4}\lambda ^2\) N CN ( D , λ ) 1 4 λ 2 , i.e., the corresponding Pólya’s conjecture, valid. Also, we establish some asymptotic estimate for this new type of eigenvalues.