Scholarlink

<p>This study evaluates the two-group interfacial area transport equation (2G IATE) coupled with the S-Gamma (<i>S</i><sub><i>γ</i></sub>) population balance equation (PBE) model for beyond bubbly flow regimes in a vertical large-diameter pipe. The 2G IATE framework incorporates intergroup mass transfer mechanisms and is implemented within the <i>S</i><sub><i>γ</i></sub> model, which assumes a log-normal bubble size distribution. The numerical approach is validated against experimental data from Schlegel et al. (2012), with a focus on the void fraction and interfacial area concentration (IAC) distributions. The results show that 2G IATE improves the predictions of the void fraction and IAC, although its accuracy varies with flow conditions. Dominant transport mechanisms, such as bubble interaction (IM), IAC from mass transfer between group-1 and group-2 bubbles (MT), and volume expansion (VE), are analyzed, revealing that the IM is the primary contributor to IAC variations, whereas MT effects become more significant at higher gas velocities. These findings contribute to the advancement of multiphase flow modeling, with potential applications in nuclear reactor safety, chemical processing, and CFD-based two-phase flow simulations.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evaluation of two-group IATE coupling with PBE for beyond bubbly flows in a large diameter pipe

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月3日

查看全文
  • Sungje Hong,
  • Joshua. P. Schlegel,
  • Subash L. Sharma

摘要

This study evaluates the two-group interfacial area transport equation (2G IATE) coupled with the S-Gamma (Sγ) population balance equation (PBE) model for beyond bubbly flow regimes in a vertical large-diameter pipe. The 2G IATE framework incorporates intergroup mass transfer mechanisms and is implemented within the Sγ model, which assumes a log-normal bubble size distribution. The numerical approach is validated against experimental data from Schlegel et al. (2012), with a focus on the void fraction and interfacial area concentration (IAC) distributions. The results show that 2G IATE improves the predictions of the void fraction and IAC, although its accuracy varies with flow conditions. Dominant transport mechanisms, such as bubble interaction (IM), IAC from mass transfer between group-1 and group-2 bubbles (MT), and volume expansion (VE), are analyzed, revealing that the IM is the primary contributor to IAC variations, whereas MT effects become more significant at higher gas velocities. These findings contribute to the advancement of multiphase flow modeling, with potential applications in nuclear reactor safety, chemical processing, and CFD-based two-phase flow simulations.