<p>This article explores the existential implications of AI-assisted writing and the rise of ‘post-authorship pedagogy.’ It refers to a condition where the human subject is no longer the exclusive arbitrator or the primary originator of thought and expression in higher education. AI’s auto-ideation not only predetermines meaning but also initiates a moment of ‘singularity’ characterized by post-authorship communication. As theorized here, it signals not the Barthesian death of the author but their replacement—an ontological shift in which authorship itself is outsourced, diminished, and reconfigured. This article examines the philosophical and pedagogical stakes of this shift: What happens to communication when human authorship is eclipsed by AI and manufactured via the high-tech manipulation of existing content? How might we reconceive pedagogy in a post-authorship age, where the learner’s tools for thinking are displaced and silenced by intelligent systems? The pedagogical implications include reducing the instructor to the role of a gatekeeper or AI intermediary, while the learner emerges as someone disengaged from the emotional and cognitive struggles traditionally involved in the act of expression. This Point of Departure argues that these are moments of pedagogical singularity and sites of existential rupture, offering pathways through which higher education teaching might not only respond but be reimagined.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Post-authorship and AI-Assisted Writing: Singularity, Communication, and Pedagogy in Higher Education

  • Wisam Kh. Abdul-Jabbar,
  • Ibrar Bhatt

摘要

This article explores the existential implications of AI-assisted writing and the rise of ‘post-authorship pedagogy.’ It refers to a condition where the human subject is no longer the exclusive arbitrator or the primary originator of thought and expression in higher education. AI’s auto-ideation not only predetermines meaning but also initiates a moment of ‘singularity’ characterized by post-authorship communication. As theorized here, it signals not the Barthesian death of the author but their replacement—an ontological shift in which authorship itself is outsourced, diminished, and reconfigured. This article examines the philosophical and pedagogical stakes of this shift: What happens to communication when human authorship is eclipsed by AI and manufactured via the high-tech manipulation of existing content? How might we reconceive pedagogy in a post-authorship age, where the learner’s tools for thinking are displaced and silenced by intelligent systems? The pedagogical implications include reducing the instructor to the role of a gatekeeper or AI intermediary, while the learner emerges as someone disengaged from the emotional and cognitive struggles traditionally involved in the act of expression. This Point of Departure argues that these are moments of pedagogical singularity and sites of existential rupture, offering pathways through which higher education teaching might not only respond but be reimagined.