Scholarlink

<p>In this commentary, we revisit the main topics discussed in two issues of the Journal in 2002. We then show how these discussions – circulated internationally and, uniquely, in two successive issues in two languages (which to our knowledge is still an exceptional occurrence) – has largely contributed to a shift in our scientific perspective on curriculum. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the relevance, validity and scope of the arguments in the two 2002 issues raised by and as a result of Fensham’s article and compare them with recent research. We find that the points raised back then continue to inform contemporary debates.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Curriculum scientifique: finalités, contenus, acteurs : 25 ans après un exceptionnel débat dans la Revue, où en sommes-nous?

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月22日

查看全文
  • Virginie Albe

摘要

In this commentary, we revisit the main topics discussed in two issues of the Journal in 2002. We then show how these discussions – circulated internationally and, uniquely, in two successive issues in two languages (which to our knowledge is still an exceptional occurrence) – has largely contributed to a shift in our scientific perspective on curriculum. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the relevance, validity and scope of the arguments in the two 2002 issues raised by and as a result of Fensham’s article and compare them with recent research. We find that the points raised back then continue to inform contemporary debates.