<p>Achieving effective hydrogen storage remains a major challenge, but compounds rich in hydrogen are seen as strong candidates for high-capacity gravimetric storage. This research evaluates the hydrogen storage performance of metallic, intermetallic, and complex hydrides. It highlights which types and specific compounds within these groups are most effective for practical hydrogen storage. Additionally, a short comparison was conducted to examine how hydrogen storage capacities vary with molar mass. Metallic and intermetallic hydrides typically have limited hydrogen storage due to their higher molar masses and strong metal hydrogen bonds. In contrast, complex hydrides tend to offer much higher storage capacities than elemental or intermetallic counterparts, making them especially attractive for applications that require substantial hydrogen content. Additionally, a comparison underlines how molar mass, chemical composition, and structural features collectively affect hydrogen storage performance. Overall, the review outlines the strengths and limitations of each hydride category and suggests potential strategies for developing lightweight, high-capacity hydrogen storage materials.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparative analysis of theoretical gravimetric hydrogen storage capacities in metallic, intermetallic, and complex hydrides

  • Oumayma Eddahmani,
  • Mohammed Hadhoud,
  • Abdellah Tahiri,
  • Ahmed Sali,
  • Rodouan Touti

摘要

Achieving effective hydrogen storage remains a major challenge, but compounds rich in hydrogen are seen as strong candidates for high-capacity gravimetric storage. This research evaluates the hydrogen storage performance of metallic, intermetallic, and complex hydrides. It highlights which types and specific compounds within these groups are most effective for practical hydrogen storage. Additionally, a short comparison was conducted to examine how hydrogen storage capacities vary with molar mass. Metallic and intermetallic hydrides typically have limited hydrogen storage due to their higher molar masses and strong metal hydrogen bonds. In contrast, complex hydrides tend to offer much higher storage capacities than elemental or intermetallic counterparts, making them especially attractive for applications that require substantial hydrogen content. Additionally, a comparison underlines how molar mass, chemical composition, and structural features collectively affect hydrogen storage performance. Overall, the review outlines the strengths and limitations of each hydride category and suggests potential strategies for developing lightweight, high-capacity hydrogen storage materials.