Scholarlink

<p>Answering the question “What is Dharma according to the <i>Mahābhārata</i>?” is as complex as the epic itself, often symbolised by the <i>Dharmayuddha</i>—the war fought in the name of truth and righteousness. Key figures such as Yudhiṣṭhira and Bhīṣma are themselves portrayed as deeply conflicted in their attempts to define and uphold Dharma. This paper joins that interpretive tradition by proposing that the <i>Bhagavadgītā</i> offers the most coherent philosophical response to the epic’s normative riddles. After explaining the complexity of Dharma in the epic, we argue that the <i>Gītā</i> is not merely a didactic interlude but a sophisticated treatise that reconciles the competing voices within the <i>Mahābhārata</i>. Through a focused hermeneutic reading, the study foregrounds how the dialogue between Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna addresses essential concerns—karma, duty, social cohesion (<i>loka-saṅgraha</i>), and moral conflict—by organizing Dharma into three interconnected yet distinct categories: <i>Svadharma</i> (to hold one’s own Dharma or ontic nature), <i>Sādhāraṇa-dharma</i> (universal moral norms), and <i>Āpaddharma</i> (duty in crisis). These normative categories, interpreted in a contextual manner, form the basis of a pluralistic ethical framework that enables a deeper understanding of which Dharma applies when, making the <i>Gītā</i> not only a spiritual guide but also the <i>Mahābhārata</i>’s central philosophical key.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Dharma Out of the Mystic Cave: Bhagavadgītā—A Pluralistic Philosophy to the Normative Riddles of Mahābhārata

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月26日

查看全文
  • Rajan

摘要

Answering the question “What is Dharma according to the Mahābhārata?” is as complex as the epic itself, often symbolised by the Dharmayuddha—the war fought in the name of truth and righteousness. Key figures such as Yudhiṣṭhira and Bhīṣma are themselves portrayed as deeply conflicted in their attempts to define and uphold Dharma. This paper joins that interpretive tradition by proposing that the Bhagavadgītā offers the most coherent philosophical response to the epic’s normative riddles. After explaining the complexity of Dharma in the epic, we argue that the Gītā is not merely a didactic interlude but a sophisticated treatise that reconciles the competing voices within the Mahābhārata. Through a focused hermeneutic reading, the study foregrounds how the dialogue between Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna addresses essential concerns—karma, duty, social cohesion (loka-saṅgraha), and moral conflict—by organizing Dharma into three interconnected yet distinct categories: Svadharma (to hold one’s own Dharma or ontic nature), Sādhāraṇa-dharma (universal moral norms), and Āpaddharma (duty in crisis). These normative categories, interpreted in a contextual manner, form the basis of a pluralistic ethical framework that enables a deeper understanding of which Dharma applies when, making the Gītā not only a spiritual guide but also the Mahābhārata’s central philosophical key.