Testimony in Fragments: Narrating the Trauma of Displacement in Dave Eggers’ What is the What
摘要
This article examines Dave Eggers’ What Is the What through the lens of trauma theory and migration studies, with a focus on how narrative form engages with the psychological, racial and political ruptures of forced migration. Drawing on key theorists such as Cathy Caruth, Dori Laub, Shoshana Felman, and Frantz Fanon, the article argues that Eggers’ use of fragmented chronology, second-person narration, and ghostwritten authorship formally enact the disorientation, belatedness, and ethical instability, the characteristics of trauma. Situating the novel within contemporary debates on life writing, discussions of race and refugee testimony, the article explores the ethics of representing suffering and the role of narrative mediation in constructing refugee subjectivities. This analysis contributes to migration studies by foregrounding the aesthetic strategies through which refugee narratives operate as acts of both memory and resistance. It also argues that trauma of displacement and racial trauma are not two separate wounds. They can be observed as the same wound inflicted at multiple registers concurrently: on the psyche, on the body, on the narrative, on the community and on the very estate under which these narratives can be heard.