Scholarlink

Aim <p>To compare diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to delirium across European countries with well-established (WE) versus less-developed (LE) geriatric medicine (GM), to identify similarities, differences and potential gaps in care.</p> Methods <p>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among European geriatricians via the European Geriatric Medicine Society and professional networks from July 2023 to March 2024. Responses on delirium diagnosis and management were analyzed quantitatively, with comparisons between WE and LDGM countries.</p> Results <p>Of 196 hospital-based respondents, 79.1% were from WEGM countries and 20.9% from LDGM countries. Structured delirium screening was significantly more common in WEGM nations, especially in geriatric (88.4% <i>vs</i> 43.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and orthopedic wards. Non-pharmacological strategies—such as hydration support (76.8% <i>vs</i> 52.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and family involvement (81.5% <i>vs</i> 60.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.005)—were also more frequently used. Conversely, physical restraints were more commonly employed in LDGM countries (70.7% <i>vs</i> 41.4%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), as were pharmacological treatments, such as trazodone and quetiapine.</p> Conclusion <p>Marked differences exist in delirium management across Europe, which may be linked at least in part to GM development, although confounding factors may exist, and causality cannot be assumed. WEGM countries appear to prioritize structured screening and non-pharmacological interventions, whereas LDGM countries rely more on pharmacological treatments. These findings highlight the need for standardized European guidelines to ensure equitable delirium care.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Bridging the gap in delirium management: a European comparison of geriatric practices

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月29日

查看全文
  • Alessandra Coin,
  • Silvia Sturani,
  • Christian Pozzi,
  • Maela Caudal,
  • Duygu Erbas Sacar,
  • Massimiliano Fedecostante,
  • Maria Cristina Ferrara,
  • Antonio Cherubini,
  • Alessandro Morandi,
  • Gulistan Bahat,
  • Giuseppe Bellelli,
  • Suzanne Timmons

摘要

Aim

To compare diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to delirium across European countries with well-established (WE) versus less-developed (LE) geriatric medicine (GM), to identify similarities, differences and potential gaps in care.

Methods

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among European geriatricians via the European Geriatric Medicine Society and professional networks from July 2023 to March 2024. Responses on delirium diagnosis and management were analyzed quantitatively, with comparisons between WE and LDGM countries.

Results

Of 196 hospital-based respondents, 79.1% were from WEGM countries and 20.9% from LDGM countries. Structured delirium screening was significantly more common in WEGM nations, especially in geriatric (88.4% vs 43.9%, p < 0.001) and orthopedic wards. Non-pharmacological strategies—such as hydration support (76.8% vs 52.5%, p = 0.002) and family involvement (81.5% vs 60.4%, p = 0.005)—were also more frequently used. Conversely, physical restraints were more commonly employed in LDGM countries (70.7% vs 41.4%, p < 0.001), as were pharmacological treatments, such as trazodone and quetiapine.

Conclusion

Marked differences exist in delirium management across Europe, which may be linked at least in part to GM development, although confounding factors may exist, and causality cannot be assumed. WEGM countries appear to prioritize structured screening and non-pharmacological interventions, whereas LDGM countries rely more on pharmacological treatments. These findings highlight the need for standardized European guidelines to ensure equitable delirium care.