错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Physical frailty is related to oxidative stress through thiol/disulfide homeostasis parameters

  • Merve Hafızoğlu,
  • Funda Eren,
  • Salim Neşelioğlu,
  • Zeynep Şahiner,
  • Didem Karaduman,
  • Cansu Atbaş,
  • Ayşe Dikmeer,
  • İbrahim İleri,
  • Cafer Balcı,
  • Burcu Balam Doğu,
  • Mustafa Cankurtaran,
  • Özcan Erel,
  • Meltem Gülhan Halil

摘要

Aim

To evaluate relationship between frailty and oxidative stress through thiol/disulfide homeostasis parameters [Native thiol (NT), total thiol (TT), and disulfide levels (D), disulfide–native thiol (D/NT), disulfide–total thiol (D/TT), native thiol–total thiol (NT/TT) ratios, and ischemia-modified albumin levels (IMA)].

Materials and methods

In total, 139 community-dwelling older adults were included. The frailty status, defined by the FRIED frailty index (FFI) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and comprehensive geriatric assessment results compared with thiol/disulfide homeostasis parameters and ischemia-modified albumin levels.

Results

NT and TT levels were significantly lower in the frail group (respectively; p = 0.014, p = 0.020). The FFI scores were correlated with the levels of NT, TT, D/NT, D/TT, and NT/TT (respectively; r = − 0.25, r = − 0.24, r = 0.17, r = 0.17, r = − 0.17). The significant correlation could not be retained with the CFS scores. In ROC analysis, the AUC for NT was calculated as 0.639 in diagnosing frailty according to the FFI (95% CI 0.542–0.737), AUC was 0.638 for TT (95% CI 0.540–0.735), and AUC was 0.610 for NT/TT (95% CI 0.511–0.780). The AUC was calculated as 0.610 for both D/NT and D/TT in diagnosing physical frailty (95% CI 0.511–0.708).

Conclusion

Thiol/disulfide homeostasis parameters can be a potential biomarker in diagnosing physical frailty. However, further studies are needed for diagnosing frailty defined with cumulative deficit models.