<p>In this paper, we consider the following generalized quasilinear Schrödinger equation <Equation ID="Equ59"> <MediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41980_2024_944_Article_Equ59.gif" Format="GIF" Height="22" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="535" /> </MediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} -\text {div}(g^{2}(u)\nabla u)+g(u)g'(u)|\nabla u|^{2}+ V(x)u=\lambda Q(x)|u|^{q-2}u+f(u), \ x \in {\mathbb {R}}^{2}, \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mrow> <mo>-</mo> <mtext>div</mtext> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mi>g</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>+</mo> <mi>g</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mi>g</mi> <mo>′</mo> </msup> <msup> <mrow> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>+</mo> <mi>V</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mi>λ</mi> <mi>Q</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>q</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> <mi>u</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mi>f</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>u</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="4pt" /> <mi>x</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>where <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41980_2024_944_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="67" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(q\in (1,2)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>q</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41980_2024_944_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="42" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\lambda &gt;0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>λ</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and <i>Q</i> is indefinite in sign, and <i>f</i> fulfills the critical exponential growth with respect to Trudinger-Moser inequality. Different from the usual polynomial growth condition as in [<CitationRef CitationID="CR27">27</CitationRef>, <CitationRef CitationID="CR45">45</CitationRef>], this paper employs the asymptotic condition <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41980_2024_944_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="30" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="116" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\liminf \limits _{t\rightarrow +\infty } \frac{tf(t)}{e^{\zeta _0 t^{2\alpha }}}\ge \kappa \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <munder> <mo movablelimits="false">lim inf</mo> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">→</mo> <mo>+</mo> <mi>∞</mi> </mrow> </munder> <mfrac> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mi>f</mi> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mi>e</mi> <mrow> <msub> <mi>ζ</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> <msup> <mi>t</mi> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>α</mi> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </msup> </mfrac> <mo>≥</mo> <mi>κ</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> to restore the compactness due to the critical exponential growth. By applying variational methods and a change of variables and some techniques in [<CitationRef CitationID="CR9">9</CitationRef>] to estimate finely the minimax level of the energy functional, we obtain the existence of two different nontrivial solutions for this problem in the Sobolev space <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41980_2024_944_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="20" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="52" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(H^1({{\mathbb {R}}}^2)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msup> <mi>H</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Two Solutions for the Planar Generalized Quasilinear Schrödinger Equation with Combined Nonlinearities and Critical Exponential Growth

  • Wenting Zhao,
  • Xianjiu Huang

摘要

In this paper, we consider the following generalized quasilinear Schrödinger equation \(\begin{aligned} -\text {div}(g^{2}(u)\nabla u)+g(u)g'(u)|\nabla u|^{2}+ V(x)u=\lambda Q(x)|u|^{q-2}u+f(u), \ x \in {\mathbb {R}}^{2}, \end{aligned}\) - div ( g 2 ( u ) u ) + g ( u ) g ( u ) | u | 2 + V ( x ) u = λ Q ( x ) | u | q - 2 u + f ( u ) , x R 2 , where \(q\in (1,2)\) q ( 1 , 2 ) , \(\lambda >0\) λ > 0 , and Q is indefinite in sign, and f fulfills the critical exponential growth with respect to Trudinger-Moser inequality. Different from the usual polynomial growth condition as in [27, 45], this paper employs the asymptotic condition \(\liminf \limits _{t\rightarrow +\infty } \frac{tf(t)}{e^{\zeta _0 t^{2\alpha }}}\ge \kappa \) lim inf t + t f ( t ) e ζ 0 t 2 α κ to restore the compactness due to the critical exponential growth. By applying variational methods and a change of variables and some techniques in [9] to estimate finely the minimax level of the energy functional, we obtain the existence of two different nontrivial solutions for this problem in the Sobolev space \(H^1({{\mathbb {R}}}^2)\) H 1 ( R 2 ) .