Scholarlink

<p>Engineering education often prioritises technical skills over the development of creativity and entrepreneurial thinking. Measuring the efficacy of entrepreneurship education (EE) remains challenging, as traditional metrics—such as startups launched, or funding raised—are impractical for students to show achievement on during a course of study. Hence, we adopt the European Commission’s EntreComp framework to assess entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) through <i>competency-based</i> outcomes. An 8-wave quasi-experimental study with 95 postgraduate students (10% engineering, 90% non-engineering) was performed during the 2023–24 academic year. Students completed an EntreComp-aligned entrepreneurial aptitude test (EAT) at induction and after each of seven experiential EE ‘touchpoints’. We tested five hypotheses focused on self-efficacy gains, cumulative effects, disciplinary and gender differences, and competency-level variation. To enhance methodological robustness, we triangulated survey data with tutor observations and critical reflections on student artefacts. Results showed a significant overall increase in ESE (Δ<i>M</i> = + 2.27, <i>p</i> &lt; .001). Gains were cumulative, with distinct patterns by academic background and marginal gender effects. The strongest improvements were in ‘Valuing Ideas’, ‘Taking the Initiative’, and ‘Working with Others’. These findings demonstrate that scaffolded, experiential EE can effectively build entrepreneurial competencies, particularly cognitive and behavioural ones. The study offers engineering educators a robust method to evidence and enhance entrepreneurial impact in diverse student cohorts.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Building entrepreneurial self-efficacy in engineering students: towards a new methodological framework

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月9日

查看全文
  • Ali Ahmad,
  • Dwitya Amry,
  • Zixuan Chen,
  • Yubei Hu

摘要

Engineering education often prioritises technical skills over the development of creativity and entrepreneurial thinking. Measuring the efficacy of entrepreneurship education (EE) remains challenging, as traditional metrics—such as startups launched, or funding raised—are impractical for students to show achievement on during a course of study. Hence, we adopt the European Commission’s EntreComp framework to assess entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) through competency-based outcomes. An 8-wave quasi-experimental study with 95 postgraduate students (10% engineering, 90% non-engineering) was performed during the 2023–24 academic year. Students completed an EntreComp-aligned entrepreneurial aptitude test (EAT) at induction and after each of seven experiential EE ‘touchpoints’. We tested five hypotheses focused on self-efficacy gains, cumulative effects, disciplinary and gender differences, and competency-level variation. To enhance methodological robustness, we triangulated survey data with tutor observations and critical reflections on student artefacts. Results showed a significant overall increase in ESE (ΔM = + 2.27, p < .001). Gains were cumulative, with distinct patterns by academic background and marginal gender effects. The strongest improvements were in ‘Valuing Ideas’, ‘Taking the Initiative’, and ‘Working with Others’. These findings demonstrate that scaffolded, experiential EE can effectively build entrepreneurial competencies, particularly cognitive and behavioural ones. The study offers engineering educators a robust method to evidence and enhance entrepreneurial impact in diverse student cohorts.