<p>Low hydration activity and challenging management of delayed expansion restrict the application of fly ash <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left(FA\right)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mi>F</mi> <mi>A</mi> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(MgO\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">MgO</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> expansive additive <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left(MEA\right)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mi>M</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mi>A</mi> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in cement pastes. Very few research on machine learning techniques for volume expansion <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left({V}_{e}\right)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mi>e</mi> </msub> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> in such systems have been conducted already. This study develops a machine learning framework to predict the volume expansion <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left({V}_{e}\right)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mi>e</mi> </msub> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> of cement pastes incorporating fly ash <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left(FA\right)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mi>F</mi> <mi>A</mi> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(MgO\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">MgO</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> expansive additive <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left(MEA\right)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mi>M</mi> <mi>E</mi> <mi>A</mi> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, materials whose low hydration activity and delayed expansion complicate their practical use. A dataset of 170 samples compiled from published literature was utilized, comprising four input variables—Portland cement content (<InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(PC\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">PC</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, %), fly ash content (<InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(FA\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">FA</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, %), <InlineEquation ID="IEq11"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(MgO\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">MgO</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> expansive additive (<InlineEquation ID="IEq12"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(MEA\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">MEA</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, %), and curing age (<InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(SA\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">SA</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, days)—to predict the target variable, <InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V}_{e}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mi>e</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>(%). A Categorical Boosting <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left(CatBoost\right)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mi>C</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>B</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> model was optimized using two recent metaheuristic algorithms, the Starfish Optimization Algorithm <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left(StOA\right)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mi>S</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>O</mi> <mi>A</mi> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and the Flood Optimization Algorithm <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left(FlOA\right)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mi>F</mi> <mi>l</mi> <mi>O</mi> <mi>A</mi> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, to enhance prediction accuracy. Model performance was assessed through cross-validation, normalization, and feature importance analysis, with 70% of the data (n = 119) used for training and 30% (n = 51) for testing. The optimized <InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(CatBoost-StOA\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>C</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>B</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>o</mi> <mi>s</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mi>S</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mi>O</mi> <mi>A</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> model achieved the best performance, with <InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(RMSLE\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="italic">RMSLE</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> values of 0.00404 (training) and 0.0053 (testing), corresponding to low mean absolute and root mean square errors in predicting <InlineEquation ID="IEq20"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({V}_{e}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>V</mi> <mi>e</mi> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. These results demonstrate the model’s potential as a reliable predictive tool for mix design optimization and dimensional stability control in cementitious materials.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Enhancing dimensional stability in cement pastes: a machine learning approach with metaheuristic-optimized categorical boosting

  • Mahzad Esmaeili-Falak,
  • Behzad Sojoudi

摘要

Low hydration activity and challenging management of delayed expansion restrict the application of fly ash \(\left(FA\right)\) F A and \(MgO\) MgO expansive additive \(\left(MEA\right)\) M E A in cement pastes. Very few research on machine learning techniques for volume expansion \(\left({V}_{e}\right)\) V e in such systems have been conducted already. This study develops a machine learning framework to predict the volume expansion \(\left({V}_{e}\right)\) V e of cement pastes incorporating fly ash \(\left(FA\right)\) F A and \(MgO\) MgO expansive additive \(\left(MEA\right)\) M E A , materials whose low hydration activity and delayed expansion complicate their practical use. A dataset of 170 samples compiled from published literature was utilized, comprising four input variables—Portland cement content ( \(PC\) PC , %), fly ash content ( \(FA\) FA , %), \(MgO\) MgO expansive additive ( \(MEA\) MEA , %), and curing age ( \(SA\) SA , days)—to predict the target variable, \({V}_{e}\) V e (%). A Categorical Boosting \(\left(CatBoost\right)\) C a t B o o s t model was optimized using two recent metaheuristic algorithms, the Starfish Optimization Algorithm \(\left(StOA\right)\) S t O A and the Flood Optimization Algorithm \(\left(FlOA\right)\) F l O A , to enhance prediction accuracy. Model performance was assessed through cross-validation, normalization, and feature importance analysis, with 70% of the data (n = 119) used for training and 30% (n = 51) for testing. The optimized \(CatBoost-StOA\) C a t B o o s t - S t O A model achieved the best performance, with \(RMSLE\) RMSLE values of 0.00404 (training) and 0.0053 (testing), corresponding to low mean absolute and root mean square errors in predicting \({V}_{e}\) V e . These results demonstrate the model’s potential as a reliable predictive tool for mix design optimization and dimensional stability control in cementitious materials.