<p>The Atlas Mountain chain is known for its structural complexity. This belt is characterized by significant geological processes, making it one of the more tectonized areas in the MENA Region. Classical methods of neotectonic assessment frequently fall short in providing the precision required to analyze the intricate nature of tectonic processes. This limitation highlights the necessity for more advanced methodologies to enhance our understanding of these complexities. In this study, we assess the tectonic dynamics of the Ouenza region by integrating seven geomorphic indices: basin asymmetry, transverse topography, mountain front sinuosity, drainage basin shape, stream-length gradients, hypsometric integral, and relative tectonic uplift. To rank the watersheds according to their tectonic activity, we employed the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. This approach allows for an accurate evaluation of tectonic influences in the area. The results indicate that the hypsometric integral varies from 0.07 to 0.44, while stream-length gradient analyses range from 26.91 to 183.14, suggesting low tectonic activity in the region. In contrast, other indices reveal more significant tectonic influences: sub-basin asymmetry ranges from 16.94 to 78.15, mountain front sinuosity varies between 0.95 and 1.27, drainage basin shape spans from 1.01 to 4.98, and relative tectonic uplift measures between 1.17 and 1.44. These findings collectively suggest moderate to high tectonic activity in the area. The integrated analysis of these indices, encapsulated in a single Index of Active Tectonics (IAT), indicates that the study area is undergoing high levels of tectonic activity. The TOPSIS method has effectively prioritized the sub-watersheds, pinpointing regions of significant tectonic concern. This methodology provides a robust framework for assessing tectonic activity, thereby improving scientific understanding and facilitating practical measures for hazard mitigation and preparedness in tectonically active areas.</p> Graphical Abstract <p>The abstract provides a comprehensive overview of the study’s main findings and methodology. It highlights various geomorphic indices utilized in the analysis, including the Asymmetry Factor, Drainage Basin Shape Index, Stream Length Gradient Index, Mountain Front Sinuosity, Relative Tectonic Uplift, and Hypsometric Integral. These indices are instrumental in identifying active tectonic deformation within mountainous or watershed regions, showcasing how the landscape responds to tectonic activities. The geomorphic indicators are integrated into three statistical models: the IRAT, TOPSIS, and FAHP. Each model is tailored to facilitate informed decision-making regarding the development and assessment of a region’s tectonic structures. The IRAT categorizes morphometric parameters, while the TOPSIS ranks sub-basins based on their similarity to ideal conditions. The FAHP employs fuzzy logic to compute relative tectonic scores, enhancing the accuracy of the prioritization process. The output maps generated from these methods, displayed on the right side of the paper, illustrate the spatial distribution of tectonic activities across the region. They are crucial for pinpointing priority areas for further geodynamic studies and hazard assessments. The graphical abstract underscores the benefits of employing multi-objective decision-making tools to analyze geomorphic data, ultimately contributing to a deeper understanding of tectonic influences and facilitating proactive management strategies.</p> <p></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Neotectonic Activity Assessment in a Diapiric Zone Using a Multi-Criteria Analysis- Method

  • Hassan Taib,
  • Riheb Hadji,
  • Younes Hamed,
  • Matteo Gentilucci,
  • Khan Shuhab,
  • Maurizio Barbieri,
  • Gilberto Pambianchi,
  • Rayan Khalil,
  • Basim Asghar,
  • Khaoula Bedri

摘要

The Atlas Mountain chain is known for its structural complexity. This belt is characterized by significant geological processes, making it one of the more tectonized areas in the MENA Region. Classical methods of neotectonic assessment frequently fall short in providing the precision required to analyze the intricate nature of tectonic processes. This limitation highlights the necessity for more advanced methodologies to enhance our understanding of these complexities. In this study, we assess the tectonic dynamics of the Ouenza region by integrating seven geomorphic indices: basin asymmetry, transverse topography, mountain front sinuosity, drainage basin shape, stream-length gradients, hypsometric integral, and relative tectonic uplift. To rank the watersheds according to their tectonic activity, we employed the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. This approach allows for an accurate evaluation of tectonic influences in the area. The results indicate that the hypsometric integral varies from 0.07 to 0.44, while stream-length gradient analyses range from 26.91 to 183.14, suggesting low tectonic activity in the region. In contrast, other indices reveal more significant tectonic influences: sub-basin asymmetry ranges from 16.94 to 78.15, mountain front sinuosity varies between 0.95 and 1.27, drainage basin shape spans from 1.01 to 4.98, and relative tectonic uplift measures between 1.17 and 1.44. These findings collectively suggest moderate to high tectonic activity in the area. The integrated analysis of these indices, encapsulated in a single Index of Active Tectonics (IAT), indicates that the study area is undergoing high levels of tectonic activity. The TOPSIS method has effectively prioritized the sub-watersheds, pinpointing regions of significant tectonic concern. This methodology provides a robust framework for assessing tectonic activity, thereby improving scientific understanding and facilitating practical measures for hazard mitigation and preparedness in tectonically active areas.

Graphical Abstract

The abstract provides a comprehensive overview of the study’s main findings and methodology. It highlights various geomorphic indices utilized in the analysis, including the Asymmetry Factor, Drainage Basin Shape Index, Stream Length Gradient Index, Mountain Front Sinuosity, Relative Tectonic Uplift, and Hypsometric Integral. These indices are instrumental in identifying active tectonic deformation within mountainous or watershed regions, showcasing how the landscape responds to tectonic activities. The geomorphic indicators are integrated into three statistical models: the IRAT, TOPSIS, and FAHP. Each model is tailored to facilitate informed decision-making regarding the development and assessment of a region’s tectonic structures. The IRAT categorizes morphometric parameters, while the TOPSIS ranks sub-basins based on their similarity to ideal conditions. The FAHP employs fuzzy logic to compute relative tectonic scores, enhancing the accuracy of the prioritization process. The output maps generated from these methods, displayed on the right side of the paper, illustrate the spatial distribution of tectonic activities across the region. They are crucial for pinpointing priority areas for further geodynamic studies and hazard assessments. The graphical abstract underscores the benefits of employing multi-objective decision-making tools to analyze geomorphic data, ultimately contributing to a deeper understanding of tectonic influences and facilitating proactive management strategies.