Scholarlink

<p>The Zagros forests provide vital ecosystem services, but their economic value is often overlooked in policy, leading to degradation. This study quantifies and compares the economic value of water storage and soil conservation services between forest and rangeland ecosystems in the Kolm watershed, Ilam, Iran. Using hydrological modeling (Justin and Turk methods) and the Modified PSIAC model for erosion assessment, we applied the replacement cost method for economic valuation. Our results demonstrate the overwhelming superiority of forests: they stored 2.4 times more water than rangelands, with an economic value of 301.50 USD/ha/year compared to 126.75 USD/ha/year. Forests also conserved significantly higher levels of soil nutrients and reduced erosion more effectively. The annual economic value of soil nutrient conservation was 64% higher in forests. These findings provide policymakers with robust, quantified evidence of the severe economic losses associated with deforestation. We urgently recommend integrating these values into land-use planning, implementing Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes, and prioritizing forest conservation to safeguard water security and soil fertility in the Zagros region.The dual-currency valuation in this study enhances the results’ applicability for both local decision-making and global comparisons.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Economic Valuation of Water Storage & Soil Conservation in Zagros Forests: A Case Study of Kolm Watershed, Ilam

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年10月30日

查看全文
  • Ali Mahdavi,
  • Ali Mohamad Ranjbar,
  • Omid Karami

摘要

The Zagros forests provide vital ecosystem services, but their economic value is often overlooked in policy, leading to degradation. This study quantifies and compares the economic value of water storage and soil conservation services between forest and rangeland ecosystems in the Kolm watershed, Ilam, Iran. Using hydrological modeling (Justin and Turk methods) and the Modified PSIAC model for erosion assessment, we applied the replacement cost method for economic valuation. Our results demonstrate the overwhelming superiority of forests: they stored 2.4 times more water than rangelands, with an economic value of 301.50 USD/ha/year compared to 126.75 USD/ha/year. Forests also conserved significantly higher levels of soil nutrients and reduced erosion more effectively. The annual economic value of soil nutrient conservation was 64% higher in forests. These findings provide policymakers with robust, quantified evidence of the severe economic losses associated with deforestation. We urgently recommend integrating these values into land-use planning, implementing Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes, and prioritizing forest conservation to safeguard water security and soil fertility in the Zagros region.The dual-currency valuation in this study enhances the results’ applicability for both local decision-making and global comparisons.