Scholarlink

<p>This corpus-based study investigates the <i>nǐ zhè(ge)/gè +</i> NP constructions in Chinese: <i>nǐ zhège</i> + NP, <i>nǐ zhè</i> + NP and <i>nǐ gè</i> + NP, where <i>nǐ</i> is ‘you’, <i>zhège/zhè</i> a demonstrative phrase and <i>gè</i> a classifier. Drawing on data from the Chinese Web Corpus 2011, we conduct a multiple distinctive collexeme analysis, together with a detailed analysis of co-text, to examine the impolite use of the constructions and their relationships with one another. Our results demonstrate that all three constructions are conventionalized for impoliteness, which contradicts the prevailing view in the literature that (im)politeness is just a matter of context and needs to be evaluated in each situation. <i>Nǐ gè</i> + NP is also shown to differ significantly from the other two constructions in terms of the attracted noun phrases, the proportion of impolite usage, the nature of the impoliteness, and the proportion of address usage. We therefore argue, contrary to some earlier claims, that <i>nǐ gè</i> + NP is an independent construction rather than a reduced form of <i>nǐ zhège</i> + NP. Finally, we examine how the constructions’ components –the second person pronoun, proximal demonstrative, and general classifier– contribute to their impoliteness.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A corpus study of conventionalized constructions of impoliteness in Chinese

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月10日

查看全文
  • Yue Hu,
  • Daniel Van Olmen

摘要

This corpus-based study investigates the nǐ zhè(ge)/gè + NP constructions in Chinese: nǐ zhège + NP, nǐ zhè + NP and nǐ gè + NP, where nǐ is ‘you’, zhège/zhè a demonstrative phrase and gè a classifier. Drawing on data from the Chinese Web Corpus 2011, we conduct a multiple distinctive collexeme analysis, together with a detailed analysis of co-text, to examine the impolite use of the constructions and their relationships with one another. Our results demonstrate that all three constructions are conventionalized for impoliteness, which contradicts the prevailing view in the literature that (im)politeness is just a matter of context and needs to be evaluated in each situation. Nǐ gè + NP is also shown to differ significantly from the other two constructions in terms of the attracted noun phrases, the proportion of impolite usage, the nature of the impoliteness, and the proportion of address usage. We therefore argue, contrary to some earlier claims, that nǐ gè + NP is an independent construction rather than a reduced form of nǐ zhège + NP. Finally, we examine how the constructions’ components –the second person pronoun, proximal demonstrative, and general classifier– contribute to their impoliteness.