<p>Precast plants face labor shortages, tight delivery windows, and increasingly complex internal logistics, yet decision-level methods that couple robot-level processing times with factory layout–routing–scheduling remain limited. This paper proposes an integrated workflow for designing or retrofitting an Optimized Robotic Conveyor for Precast Concrete (ORC-PC) line and demonstrates it on a six-story reference building. Elements are grouped into product families and mapped to robotic operational units (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(U_0\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>–<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(U_{12}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mi>U</mi> <mn>12</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), each representing a defined workcell or resource in the ORC-PC line, in a Rhino3D factory model consistent with KUKA workspaces, safety envelopes, and formwork geometry. Family-dependent cycle times from KUKA.sim drive a Particle swarm optimisation layout model that minimizes flow-weighted conveyor length under non-overlap and clearance constraints, yielding a compact layout of approximately <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(43\times 29\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>43</mn> <mo>×</mo> <mn>29</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>&#xa0;m with a loop length of about 96.6&#xa0;m and implied internal transport times on the order of 10–15&#xa0;min per element. A Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem then embeds transport and processing times to identify bottlenecks and quantify parallelisation strategies. Results show that curing time and curing-capacity limits dominate throughput, with cage fabrication and downstream drilling acting as secondary bottlenecks under nominal parameters. Overall, under the assumed curing-capacity and scheduling parameters, the ORC-PC line approaches a production rate on the order of one story per day for the structural frame of the reference building (footprint <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\approx 320~\text {m}^2\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mo>≈</mo> <mn>320</mn> <mspace width="3.33333pt" /> <msup> <mtext>m</mtext> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), providing a transferable, data-driven workflow to link robot cycle times to layout decisions and capacity-planning recommendations.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Robotic conveyor line for precast-concrete building production: units, layout optimisation, and parallel scheduling

  • Abtin Baghdadi,
  • Harald Kloft

摘要

Precast plants face labor shortages, tight delivery windows, and increasingly complex internal logistics, yet decision-level methods that couple robot-level processing times with factory layout–routing–scheduling remain limited. This paper proposes an integrated workflow for designing or retrofitting an Optimized Robotic Conveyor for Precast Concrete (ORC-PC) line and demonstrates it on a six-story reference building. Elements are grouped into product families and mapped to robotic operational units ( \(U_0\) U 0 \(U_{12}\) U 12 ), each representing a defined workcell or resource in the ORC-PC line, in a Rhino3D factory model consistent with KUKA workspaces, safety envelopes, and formwork geometry. Family-dependent cycle times from KUKA.sim drive a Particle swarm optimisation layout model that minimizes flow-weighted conveyor length under non-overlap and clearance constraints, yielding a compact layout of approximately \(43\times 29\) 43 × 29  m with a loop length of about 96.6 m and implied internal transport times on the order of 10–15 min per element. A Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem then embeds transport and processing times to identify bottlenecks and quantify parallelisation strategies. Results show that curing time and curing-capacity limits dominate throughput, with cage fabrication and downstream drilling acting as secondary bottlenecks under nominal parameters. Overall, under the assumed curing-capacity and scheduling parameters, the ORC-PC line approaches a production rate on the order of one story per day for the structural frame of the reference building (footprint \(\approx 320~\text {m}^2\) 320 m 2 ), providing a transferable, data-driven workflow to link robot cycle times to layout decisions and capacity-planning recommendations.